TY - JOUR
T1 - Cost-effectiveness of additional hepatitis B virus nucleic acid testing of individual donations or minipools of six donations in the Netherlands
AU - Borkent-Raven, B.A.
AU - Janssen, M.P.
AU - Van Der Poel, C.L.
AU - De Wit, G.A.
AU - Bonsel, G.J.
AU - Van Hout, B.A.
PY - 2009/2
Y1 - 2009/2
N2 - BACKGROUND: To further reduce the risk of hepatitis B virus (HBV) transmission by blood transfusion, nucleic acid testing (NAT) can be employed. The aim of this study is to estimate the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) in the Netherlands of employing a triplex NAT assay aimed at HBV nucleic acid detection in individual donations (ID-NAT) or in minipools of 6 donations (MP-6-NAT), compared to a triplex NAT assay in minipools of 24 donations (MP-24-NAT). STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A mathematical model was made of the whole transfusion chain from donors to recipients of blood in the Netherlands. The annual number of avoided HBV transmissions was estimated with the window-period incidence model. The natural history of a HBV infection in recipients is described by a Markov model. RESULTS: The ICER of adding HBV MP-6-NAT or HBV ID-NAT in the Netherlands is €303,218 (95% confidence interval [CI], €233,001-€408,388) and €518,995 (95% CI, €399,359-€699,120) per quality-adjusted life-year, respectively. The ICER strongly correlates with the age of transfusion recipients. CONCLUSION: The cost-effectiveness of additional HBV NAT is limited by the limited loss of life caused by HBV transmission. Despite a higher effectiveness, HBV ID-NAT is less cost-effective than MP-6-NAT due to higher costs. A future equivalent participation of immigrants from HBV-endemic countries in the donor base renders HBV NAT only slightly more cost-effective. © 2009 American Association of Blood Banks.
AB - BACKGROUND: To further reduce the risk of hepatitis B virus (HBV) transmission by blood transfusion, nucleic acid testing (NAT) can be employed. The aim of this study is to estimate the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) in the Netherlands of employing a triplex NAT assay aimed at HBV nucleic acid detection in individual donations (ID-NAT) or in minipools of 6 donations (MP-6-NAT), compared to a triplex NAT assay in minipools of 24 donations (MP-24-NAT). STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A mathematical model was made of the whole transfusion chain from donors to recipients of blood in the Netherlands. The annual number of avoided HBV transmissions was estimated with the window-period incidence model. The natural history of a HBV infection in recipients is described by a Markov model. RESULTS: The ICER of adding HBV MP-6-NAT or HBV ID-NAT in the Netherlands is €303,218 (95% confidence interval [CI], €233,001-€408,388) and €518,995 (95% CI, €399,359-€699,120) per quality-adjusted life-year, respectively. The ICER strongly correlates with the age of transfusion recipients. CONCLUSION: The cost-effectiveness of additional HBV NAT is limited by the limited loss of life caused by HBV transmission. Despite a higher effectiveness, HBV ID-NAT is less cost-effective than MP-6-NAT due to higher costs. A future equivalent participation of immigrants from HBV-endemic countries in the donor base renders HBV NAT only slightly more cost-effective. © 2009 American Association of Blood Banks.
U2 - 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2008.01968.x
DO - 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2008.01968.x
M3 - Article
SN - 0041-1132
VL - 49
SP - 311
EP - 319
JO - Transfusion
JF - Transfusion
IS - 2
ER -