Cost-effectiveness of exercise therapy in the treatment of non-specific neck pain and low back pain: a systematic review with meta-analysis

Gisela Cristiane Miyamoto, Chung-Wei Christine Lin, Cristina Maria Nunes Cabral, Johanna M. van Dongen, Maurits W. van Tulder

Research output: Contribution to JournalReview articleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the cost-effectiveness of exercise therapy in the treatment of patients with non-specific neck pain and low back pain.

DESIGN: Systematic review of economic evaluations.

DATA SOURCES: The search was performed in 5 clinical and 3 economic electronic databases.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES: We included economic evaluations performed alongside randomised controlled trials. Differences in costs and effects were pooled in a meta-analysis, if possible, and incremental cost-utility ratios (ICUR) were descriptively analysed.

RESULTS: Twenty-two studies were included. On average, exercise therapy was associated with lower costs and larger effects for quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) in comparison with usual care for subacute and chronic low back pain from a healthcare perspective (based on ICUR). Exercise therapy had similar costs and effect for QALY in comparison with other interventions for neck pain from a societal perspective, and subacute and chronic low back pain from a healthcare perspective. There was limited or inconsistent evidence on the cost-effectiveness of exercise therapy compared with usual care for neck pain and acute low back pain, other interventions for acute low back pain and different types of exercise therapy for neck pain and low back pain.

CONCLUSIONS: Exercise therapy seems to be cost-effective compared with usual care for subacute and chronic low back pain. Exercise therapy was not (more) cost-effective compared with other interventions for neck pain and low back pain. The cost-utility estimates are rather uncertain, indicating that more economic evaluations are needed.

REGISTRATION: PROSPERO, CRD42017059025.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)172-181
Number of pages11
JournalBritish Journal of Sports Medicine
Volume53
Issue number3
Early online date20 Apr 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2019

Fingerprint

Exercise Therapy
Neck Pain
Low Back Pain
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Meta-Analysis
Costs and Cost Analysis
Subacute Care
Quality-Adjusted Life Years
Therapeutics
Delivery of Health Care
Randomized Controlled Trials
Economics
Databases

Keywords

  • exercise
  • lower back
  • neck
  • rehabilitation
  • systematic review

Cite this

@article{e873f3e64a6e4020bc505d0b6e8ebb7c,
title = "Cost-effectiveness of exercise therapy in the treatment of non-specific neck pain and low back pain: a systematic review with meta-analysis",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: To investigate the cost-effectiveness of exercise therapy in the treatment of patients with non-specific neck pain and low back pain.DESIGN: Systematic review of economic evaluations.DATA SOURCES: The search was performed in 5 clinical and 3 economic electronic databases.ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES: We included economic evaluations performed alongside randomised controlled trials. Differences in costs and effects were pooled in a meta-analysis, if possible, and incremental cost-utility ratios (ICUR) were descriptively analysed.RESULTS: Twenty-two studies were included. On average, exercise therapy was associated with lower costs and larger effects for quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) in comparison with usual care for subacute and chronic low back pain from a healthcare perspective (based on ICUR). Exercise therapy had similar costs and effect for QALY in comparison with other interventions for neck pain from a societal perspective, and subacute and chronic low back pain from a healthcare perspective. There was limited or inconsistent evidence on the cost-effectiveness of exercise therapy compared with usual care for neck pain and acute low back pain, other interventions for acute low back pain and different types of exercise therapy for neck pain and low back pain.CONCLUSIONS: Exercise therapy seems to be cost-effective compared with usual care for subacute and chronic low back pain. Exercise therapy was not (more) cost-effective compared with other interventions for neck pain and low back pain. The cost-utility estimates are rather uncertain, indicating that more economic evaluations are needed.REGISTRATION: PROSPERO, CRD42017059025.",
keywords = "exercise, lower back, neck, rehabilitation, systematic review",
author = "Miyamoto, {Gisela Cristiane} and Lin, {Chung-Wei Christine} and Cabral, {Cristina Maria Nunes} and {van Dongen}, {Johanna M.} and {van Tulder}, {Maurits W.}",
year = "2019",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1136/bjsports-2017-098765",
language = "English",
volume = "53",
pages = "172--181",
journal = "British Journal of Sports Medicine",
issn = "0306-3674",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",
number = "3",

}

Cost-effectiveness of exercise therapy in the treatment of non-specific neck pain and low back pain: a systematic review with meta-analysis. / Miyamoto, Gisela Cristiane; Lin, Chung-Wei Christine; Cabral, Cristina Maria Nunes; van Dongen, Johanna M.; van Tulder, Maurits W.

In: British Journal of Sports Medicine, Vol. 53, No. 3, 02.2019, p. 172-181.

Research output: Contribution to JournalReview articleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cost-effectiveness of exercise therapy in the treatment of non-specific neck pain and low back pain: a systematic review with meta-analysis

AU - Miyamoto, Gisela Cristiane

AU - Lin, Chung-Wei Christine

AU - Cabral, Cristina Maria Nunes

AU - van Dongen, Johanna M.

AU - van Tulder, Maurits W.

PY - 2019/2

Y1 - 2019/2

N2 - OBJECTIVE: To investigate the cost-effectiveness of exercise therapy in the treatment of patients with non-specific neck pain and low back pain.DESIGN: Systematic review of economic evaluations.DATA SOURCES: The search was performed in 5 clinical and 3 economic electronic databases.ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES: We included economic evaluations performed alongside randomised controlled trials. Differences in costs and effects were pooled in a meta-analysis, if possible, and incremental cost-utility ratios (ICUR) were descriptively analysed.RESULTS: Twenty-two studies were included. On average, exercise therapy was associated with lower costs and larger effects for quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) in comparison with usual care for subacute and chronic low back pain from a healthcare perspective (based on ICUR). Exercise therapy had similar costs and effect for QALY in comparison with other interventions for neck pain from a societal perspective, and subacute and chronic low back pain from a healthcare perspective. There was limited or inconsistent evidence on the cost-effectiveness of exercise therapy compared with usual care for neck pain and acute low back pain, other interventions for acute low back pain and different types of exercise therapy for neck pain and low back pain.CONCLUSIONS: Exercise therapy seems to be cost-effective compared with usual care for subacute and chronic low back pain. Exercise therapy was not (more) cost-effective compared with other interventions for neck pain and low back pain. The cost-utility estimates are rather uncertain, indicating that more economic evaluations are needed.REGISTRATION: PROSPERO, CRD42017059025.

AB - OBJECTIVE: To investigate the cost-effectiveness of exercise therapy in the treatment of patients with non-specific neck pain and low back pain.DESIGN: Systematic review of economic evaluations.DATA SOURCES: The search was performed in 5 clinical and 3 economic electronic databases.ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES: We included economic evaluations performed alongside randomised controlled trials. Differences in costs and effects were pooled in a meta-analysis, if possible, and incremental cost-utility ratios (ICUR) were descriptively analysed.RESULTS: Twenty-two studies were included. On average, exercise therapy was associated with lower costs and larger effects for quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) in comparison with usual care for subacute and chronic low back pain from a healthcare perspective (based on ICUR). Exercise therapy had similar costs and effect for QALY in comparison with other interventions for neck pain from a societal perspective, and subacute and chronic low back pain from a healthcare perspective. There was limited or inconsistent evidence on the cost-effectiveness of exercise therapy compared with usual care for neck pain and acute low back pain, other interventions for acute low back pain and different types of exercise therapy for neck pain and low back pain.CONCLUSIONS: Exercise therapy seems to be cost-effective compared with usual care for subacute and chronic low back pain. Exercise therapy was not (more) cost-effective compared with other interventions for neck pain and low back pain. The cost-utility estimates are rather uncertain, indicating that more economic evaluations are needed.REGISTRATION: PROSPERO, CRD42017059025.

KW - exercise

KW - lower back

KW - neck

KW - rehabilitation

KW - systematic review

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85049141910&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85049141910&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1136/bjsports-2017-098765

DO - 10.1136/bjsports-2017-098765

M3 - Review article

VL - 53

SP - 172

EP - 181

JO - British Journal of Sports Medicine

JF - British Journal of Sports Medicine

SN - 0306-3674

IS - 3

ER -