Abstract
This paper warns against the risk of underestimating the costs-and the uncertainty about the costs-of achieving stringent stabilization targets. We argue that a straightforward review of integrated assessment models results produces biased estimates for the more ambitious climate objectives such as those compatible with the 2°C of the European Union and the G8. The magnitude and range of estimates are significantly reduced because only the most optimistic results are reported for such targets. We suggest a procedure that addresses this partiality. The results show highly variable costs for the most ambitious scenarios. © 2010 The Author(s).
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 769-778 |
Journal | Climatic Change |
Volume | 100 |
Issue number | 3 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2010 |