Covariation among multimodal components in the courtship display of the túngara frog

L.S. James, W. Halfwerk, K.L. Hunter, R.A. Page, R.C. Taylor, P.S. Wilson, M.J. Ryan

    Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

    44 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Communication systems often include a variety of components, including those that span modalities, which may facilitate detection and decision-making. For example, female túngara frogs and fringe-lipped bats generally rely on acoustic mating signals to find male túngara frogs in a mating or foraging context, respectively. However, two additional cues (vocal sac inflation and water ripples) can enhance detection and choice behavior. To date, we do not know the natural variation and covariation of these three components. To address this, we made detailed recordings of calling males, including call amplitude, vocal sac volume and water ripple height, in 54 frogs (2430 calls). We found that all three measures correlated, with the strongest association between the vocal sac volume and call amplitude. We also found that multimodal models predicted the mass of calling males better than unimodal models. These results demonstrate how multimodal components of a communication system relate to each other and provide an important foundation for future studies on how receivers integrate and compare complex displays.
    Original languageEnglish
    Article numberjeb241661
    Pages (from-to)1-9
    Number of pages9
    JournalJournal of Experimental Biology
    Volume224
    Issue number12
    Early online date18 Jun 2021
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Jun 2021

    Funding

    The research was funded through a grant from the National Science Foundation (IOS-1914646).

    FundersFunder number
    National Science Foundation1914646
    UK Research and Innovation104546

      Fingerprint

      Dive into the research topics of 'Covariation among multimodal components in the courtship display of the túngara frog'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

      Cite this