Abstract
This article describes how a meta-theory of change, now referred to as the “color model,” was developed over a period of two decades. We look back to better understand how one creative idea took on many manifestations and is now a widely used theory. We identify three distinct periods of development: inception, storming and norming, and maturity. In each of these periods, we discern a similar pattern of activities, in line with Smith and Hitt’s four-stage model of theory development: tension, searching, elaboration, and proclamation. The case illustrates the journey was spurred on by breakdowns in meaning, influenced by context and serendipity, and shaped by incremental elaboration. As academic practitioners, we discuss how our position in the field affected the way we approach theory development. We conclude the article with a discussion on the downside of originality.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 225-239 |
| Number of pages | 15 |
| Journal | Journal of Management Inquiry |
| Volume | 26 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Apr 2017 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities
Keywords
- change management
- organizational development
- qualitative research
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Creating a Colorful Model of Change: Reflection on Developing a Theory as Scholar-Practitioners'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver