Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Criminalisation, Containment and Courts: a call for cross-fertilisation between the social sciences and legal-doctrinal research into immigration detention in Europe

Research output: Chapter in Book / Report / Conference proceedingChapterAcademic

349 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This chapter examines how the legal regulation of such immigration detention in Europe relates to research in the social sciences on criminalisation of irregular migration and practices of containment in Europe. Practices of criminalisation and containment are extensively discussed in current scholarship, but that same literature is characterised by a lack of attention to the way in which these developments relate to the role of courts, both domestic and European. Sociological and criminological scholarship, with its predominantly one-dimensional emphasis on the penal and punitive aspects of immigration detention, risks overlooking important consequences of judicial decision-making in this area. But legal doctrinal analysis as well, more particularly regarding judicial review of detention, should engage more thoroughly with research in the social sciences, which has highlighted the increased use of containment in border control practices. Increased cross- fertilisation between legal-doctrinal research and the social sciences is called for in this area.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationResearch handbook on EU Migration and Asylum Law
EditorsLilian Tsourdi, Philippe De Bruycker
PublisherEdward Elgar Publishing Ltd.
Chapter21
Pages455-470
Number of pages26
ISBN (Electronic)9781786439635
ISBN (Print)9781786439628
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2022

Publication series

NameResearch Handbooks in European Law
PublisherEdward Elgar

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Criminalisation, Containment and Courts: a call for cross-fertilisation between the social sciences and legal-doctrinal research into immigration detention in Europe'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this