Abstract
Spatial correlations exist for many economic phenomena. We also know such interactions are typically weaker across country borders than within countries, due to institutional, infrastructural or cultural factors. However, in spatial econometric analyses, the effect of borders is rarely taken into account, and all borders between regions are treated as equal. We distinguish between different types of borders by splitting our weight matrix in two, and creating separate lags for within-country and cross-border effects. We demonstrate the effectiveness of this method in an analysis of average productivity in a region for several manufacturing sectors. Without implying causality, we relate this productivity to average productivity in surrounding regions as well as to agglomeration externalities both in its own region and in surrounding regions. We find border effects are indeed quite present: spatial lags within the country are invariably different from those across borders.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 375-383 |
| Number of pages | 9 |
| Journal | Letters in Spatial and Resource Sciences |
| Volume | 10 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Oct 2017 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 8 Decent Work and Economic Growth
Keywords
- Agglomeration externalities
- Border effects
- Spatial econometrics
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Cross-border agglomeration benefits'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver