Abstract
We examined cross-cultural differences in (1) sibling power balance and (2) the associations between sibling power balance and internalizing and externalizing problems in three separate cross-cultural studies (early childhood, late childhood, and adolescence). The early childhood samples consisted of 123 Turkish and 128 Dutch mothers (mean age for children was 4.9 years). In the late childhood samples, self-report data were collected from 124 Indian and 129 Dutch children (mean age 10.9 years). In the adolescent samples self-report data were collected from 165 ethnic Moroccan and 165 ethnic Dutch adolescents (mean age 15.2 years). In all studies, questionnaire data on sibling power imbalance and internalizing and externalizing problems were collected. Results showed only one significant cross-cultural difference in sibling power imbalance: The Indian sample reported more sibling power imbalance than the Dutch. Links between sibling power imbalance and problem behavior were highly similar between the different cultural samples. The only significant difference was a stronger impact of sibling power imbalance on externalizing problems for the Dutch compared to the Turkish sample. Concluding, few cross-cultural differences were found in sibling power imbalance. Across cultures and age groups, more sibling power imbalance was linked to more internalizing and externalizing problems.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 87-104 |
Number of pages | 18 |
Journal | New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development |
Volume | 2017 |
Issue number | 156 |
Early online date | 5 Jun 2017 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Jun 2017 |
Bibliographical note
Special Issue: Power, Control, and Influence in Sibling Relationships across DevelopmentFunding
The data for Study 3 were collected as part of the Research on Adolescents Development And Relationships (RADAR) research project, supported by main grants from the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (GB-MAGW 480?03?005), and Stichting Achmea Slachtoffer en Samenleving (SASS), and various other grants from the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research, the Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, and Utrecht University. The authors would like to express their gratitude to the children, adolescents, and mothers that participated in the studies and to the research assistants for their valuable efforts in data collection. A special thanks to research assistants Lisette Dragt and Jessie Hillekens for their help during the preliminary phase of this study.
Funders | Funder number |
---|---|
Stichting Achmea Slachtoffer en Samenleving | |
Universiteit Utrecht | |
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek | GB-MAGW 480–03–005 |