Abstract
Normative data are needed to create a reference that indicates optimal development of weight in relation to height and age, particularly in the face of the unfolding obesity epidemic. The body-mass index (BMI) has some serious limitations: it is a relatively poor predictor of current and future fatness. Currently, however, there are few available alternatives, with the possible exception of waist circumference or skinfolds. The use of cross-sectional references to construct a BMI-reference curve is problematic when there are period and cohort effects. Ideally, a reference would be based on longitudinal data in populations with little underweight, overweight, and obesity. In the meantime cross-sectional data in appropriate populations could be used to construct BMI percentiles linking BMI values at age 5 to those at age 18 (or 21) that would correspond with adult BMI values reflecting optimal health (e.g., that would correspond to adult BMI values between 21 and 23 kg/m2).
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | S189-S198 |
Number of pages | 10 |
Journal | Food and Nutrition Bulletin |
Volume | 27 |
Issue number | 4 Suppl 5 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 Dec 2006 |
Bibliographical note
4 Supplement 5: Growth StandardKeywords
- Adiposity
- Adolescent
- Age Factors
- Aging
- Body Mass Index
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (U.S.)
- Child
- Child Nutrition Disorders
- Cross-Sectional Studies
- Female
- Growth
- Humans
- Male
- Obesity
- Prevalence
- Reference Standards
- Reference Values
- Sex Factors
- United States
- World Health Organization
- Journal Article
- Review