Cynicism as Immanent Critique: Diogenes and the Philosophy of Transvaluation

Darren Gardner*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

I argue that Diogenes and early Cynicism can be understood in an explicitly social and political context, where Cynic praxis, performative public action, can be seen to make visible oppositions inherent to the polity. In doing so, Diogenes' praxis should be understood as a form of immanent critique, one that demonstrates, for example, that nature and custom (phusis and nomos) are interrelated oppositions in the polis. Cynicism here is understood as a form of immanent critique because Diogenes challenges the social norms of the polis without endorsing external universal standards or predetermined models, but from illuminating dynamics from within the polis and polity.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)123-148
Number of pages26
JournalPolis (United Kingdom)
Volume39
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 6 Jan 2022

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© Darren Gardner, 2022

Keywords

  • Ancient philosophy
  • Ancient political theory
  • Critique
  • Cynicism
  • Diogenes
  • Social normativity

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Cynicism as Immanent Critique: Diogenes and the Philosophy of Transvaluation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this