TY - CHAP
T1 - ‘Dark patterns’
T2 - The case for regulatory pluralism between the European Union's consumer and data protection regimes
AU - Leiser, M.R.
PY - 2022/1/1
Y1 - 2022/1/1
N2 - © The Editors and Contributors Severally 2022. All rights reserved."Dark patterns" is a generic term used by the design community and an increasing number of data protection academics to describe a variety of manipulative design techniques that compromise legal requirements like consent and privacy-by-design and legal principles like fairness and transparency. To assess the regulation of dark patterns, two legal frameworks of the European Union are compared and critiqued: first, an examination of relevant rules and principles of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) leads to the conclusion that the principle of data-protection-by-design could be useful, but the lack of clarity about what constitutes fairness undermines the GDPR's ability to regulate dark patterns. Second, an examination of the 'fairness' principle in the EU's consumer protection acquis reveals a significantly further developed regime. After examination of the various enforcement mechanisms across both regimes, the Chapter concludes that a pluralistic approach that mixes the strengths of one regulatory regime while compensating for the weaknesses of the other is needed to harness manipulative design techniques like dark patterns.
AB - © The Editors and Contributors Severally 2022. All rights reserved."Dark patterns" is a generic term used by the design community and an increasing number of data protection academics to describe a variety of manipulative design techniques that compromise legal requirements like consent and privacy-by-design and legal principles like fairness and transparency. To assess the regulation of dark patterns, two legal frameworks of the European Union are compared and critiqued: first, an examination of relevant rules and principles of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) leads to the conclusion that the principle of data-protection-by-design could be useful, but the lack of clarity about what constitutes fairness undermines the GDPR's ability to regulate dark patterns. Second, an examination of the 'fairness' principle in the EU's consumer protection acquis reveals a significantly further developed regime. After examination of the various enforcement mechanisms across both regimes, the Chapter concludes that a pluralistic approach that mixes the strengths of one regulatory regime while compensating for the weaknesses of the other is needed to harness manipulative design techniques like dark patterns.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85137527810&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.4337/9781800371682.00019
DO - 10.4337/9781800371682.00019
M3 - Chapter
SN - 9781800371675
SP - 240
EP - 269
BT - Research Handbook on EU Data Protection Law
PB - Taylor and Francis
ER -