Abstract
Old master drawings and historic prints often feature white highlights, which are typically painted using lead white, one of the most widely used historical white pigments. However, it has been observed that many of these highlights discolour over time, becoming dark brown or black due to unclear degradation processes. This phenomenon not only misrepresents the original artefacts, threatening their suitability for public display, but also diminishes their longevity. To ensure their preservation, it is essential to determine why some lead white highlights in these museum objects retain their light tones while others are prone to darkening. The objective of this study was to identify the relationships between the composition, provenance, and production methods of lead white pigments, and their role in the discolouration observed on drawings, lithographs and early photographs. Selected samples and artefacts were examined using a range of analytical techniques, namely X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy (XRF), X-ray powder diffraction (XRPD), and lead isotope analysis. While XRF analyses confirmed the presence of lead as the primary element in the majority of the highlights, XRPD measurements identified a variety of lead compounds such as the carbonates cerussite and hydrocerussite alongside galena—a black crystalline sulfide—and lead sulfates. Additionally, isotope analyses classified the lead raw materials into five main groups. Through these measurements, the examined lead white pigments were categorised based on their compositional properties in relation to the raw materials used, as well as their geographical and temporal origin. A significant finding is that lead white pigments from different production periods, spanning from older to more modern, may be characterised by varying proneness to discolouration irrespective of their provenance.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 109912 |
| Pages (from-to) | 1-10 |
| Number of pages | 10 |
| Journal | Microchemical Journal |
| Volume | 199 |
| Early online date | 3 Jan 2024 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Apr 2024 |
Bibliographical note
Funding Information:The authors gratefully acknowledge funding from The Villum Foundation, Tauck Ritzau Innovative Philanthropy, The Danish Ministry of Culture's Research Committee (KFU), Lektor Peer Rander Amundsens Legat – Fond, and The Danish Agency for Culture and Palaces (SLKS). The authors also express sincere gratitude to the European Synchrotron Radiation Facility (ESRF) for providing access to their synchrotron radiation resources, and are grateful to Marine Cotte, Manfred Burghammer, Alexey Melnikov, Jiliang Liu and Ida Fazlic for assistance in using beamline ID13 (proposal HG-172, pilot of a BAG project supported by the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 870313, Streamline). FWO (Brussels) is acknowledged for financial support under grant G054719N and Smart*Light (funded by the Interreg V Flanders-Netherlands program with financial support from the European Regional Development Fund ERDF). Finally, the authors thank Sofie Wikkelsø Jensen (National Gallery of Denmark) for technical assistance in the collection and preparation of the samples used in this research, and Jørgen Wadum (WATS – Wadum Art Technological Studies, Denmark) for his valuable insights.
Funding Information:
The authors gratefully acknowledge funding from The Villum Foundation, Tauck Ritzau Innovative Philanthropy, The Danish Ministry of Culture's Research Committee (KFU), Lektor Peer Rander Amundsens Legat – Fond, and The Danish Agency for Culture and Palaces (SLKS). The authors also express sincere gratitude to the European Synchrotron Radiation Facility (ESRF) for providing access to their synchrotron radiation resources, and are grateful to Marine Cotte, Manfred Burghammer, Alexey Melnikov, Jiliang Liu and Ida Fazlic for assistance in using beamline ID13 (proposal HG-172, pilot of a BAG project supported by the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 870313, Streamline). FWO (Brussels) is acknowledged for financial support under grant G054719N and Smart*Light (funded by the Interreg V Flanders-Netherlands program with financial support from the European Regional Development Fund ERDF). Finally, the authors thank Sofie Wikkelsø Jensen (National Gallery of Denmark) for technical assistance in the collection and preparation of the samples used in this research, and Jørgen Wadum (WATS – Wadum Art Technological Studies, Denmark) for his valuable insights.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 Elsevier B.V.
Funding
The authors gratefully acknowledge funding from The Villum Foundation, Tauck Ritzau Innovative Philanthropy, The Danish Ministry of Culture's Research Committee (KFU), Lektor Peer Rander Amundsens Legat – Fond, and The Danish Agency for Culture and Palaces (SLKS). The authors also express sincere gratitude to the European Synchrotron Radiation Facility (ESRF) for providing access to their synchrotron radiation resources, and are grateful to Marine Cotte, Manfred Burghammer, Alexey Melnikov, Jiliang Liu and Ida Fazlic for assistance in using beamline ID13 (proposal HG-172, pilot of a BAG project supported by the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 870313, Streamline). FWO (Brussels) is acknowledged for financial support under grant G054719N and Smart*Light (funded by the Interreg V Flanders-Netherlands program with financial support from the European Regional Development Fund ERDF). Finally, the authors thank Sofie Wikkelsø Jensen (National Gallery of Denmark) for technical assistance in the collection and preparation of the samples used in this research, and Jørgen Wadum (WATS – Wadum Art Technological Studies, Denmark) for his valuable insights. The authors gratefully acknowledge funding from The Villum Foundation, Tauck Ritzau Innovative Philanthropy, The Danish Ministry of Culture's Research Committee (KFU), Lektor Peer Rander Amundsens Legat – Fond, and The Danish Agency for Culture and Palaces (SLKS). The authors also express sincere gratitude to the European Synchrotron Radiation Facility (ESRF) for providing access to their synchrotron radiation resources, and are grateful to Marine Cotte, Manfred Burghammer, Alexey Melnikov, Jiliang Liu and Ida Fazlic for assistance in using beamline ID13 (proposal HG-172, pilot of a BAG project supported by the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 870313, Streamline). FWO (Brussels) is acknowledged for financial support under grant G054719N and Smart*Light (funded by the Interreg V Flanders-Netherlands program with financial support from the European Regional Development Fund ERDF). Finally, the authors thank Sofie Wikkelsø Jensen (National Gallery of Denmark) for technical assistance in the collection and preparation of the samples used in this research, and Jørgen Wadum (WATS – Wadum Art Technological Studies, Denmark) for his valuable insights.
| Funders | Funder number |
|---|---|
| Danish Agency for Culture and Palaces | |
| Danish Ministry of Culture's Research Committee | |
| Lektor Peer Rander Amundsens Legat – Fond | |
| SLKS | |
| Villum Fonden | |
| Horizon 2020 Framework Programme | |
| Interreg | |
| King Faisal University | |
| European Synchrotron Radiation Facility | HG-172 |
| European Synchrotron Radiation Facility | |
| Horizon 2020 | G054719N, 870313 |
| Horizon 2020 | |
| European Regional Development Fund |
Keywords
- Historic prints
- Lead isotope analysis
- Lead white discoloration
- Old master drawings
- X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy
- X-ray powder diffraction