Data as Evidence in Criminal Courts: Comparing Legal Frameworks and Actual Practices

Research output: Chapter in Book / Report / Conference proceedingChapterAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Digital traces that people leave behind can be useful evidence in criminal courts. However, in many jurisdictions, the legal provisions setting the rules for the use of evidence in criminal courts were formulated long before these digital technologies existed, and there seems to be an increasing discrepancy between legal frameworks and actual practices. This chapter investigates this disconnect by analyzing the relevant legal frameworks in the EU for processing data in criminal courts, and comparing and contrasting these with actual court practices. The relevant legal frameworks are criminal and data protection law. Data protection law is mostly harmonized throughout the EU, but since criminal law is mostly national law, this chapter focuses on criminal law in the Netherlands. We conclude that existing legal frameworks do not appear to obstruct the collection of data for evidence, but that regulation on collection in criminal law and regulation on processing and analysis in data protection law are not integrated. We also characterize as remarkable the almost complete absence of regulation of automated data analysis – in contrast with the many rules for data collection.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationHuman–Robot Interaction in Law and Its Narratives
Subtitle of host publicationLegal Blame, Procedure, and Criminal Law
EditorsSabine Gless, Helen Whalen-Bridge
PublisherCambridge University Press
Chapter10
Pages221-252
Number of pages32
ISBN (Electronic)9781009431453
ISBN (Print)9781009431507
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2024
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© Cambridge University Press & Assessment 2024.

Keywords

  • criminal investigations
  • data as evidence
  • data protection
  • digital evidence
  • privacy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Data as Evidence in Criminal Courts: Comparing Legal Frameworks and Actual Practices'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this