Data-Independent acquisition (SWATH) mass spectrometry analysis of protein content in primary neuronal cultures

Miguel A. Gonzalez-Lozano*, Frank Koopmans

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Chapter in Book / Report / Conference proceedingChapterAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Sequential Window Acquisition of all THeoretical fragment-ion (SWATH) is a recently developed discovery proteomics technique based on Data-Independent Acquisition (DIA) mass spectrometry. In this approach, MS/MS is performed simultaneously on all peptides contained in a predefined wide-open mass window of up to 25 Da. The mass window is sequentially stepped through over the entire mass range, usually between 400 and 1200 Da that covers most peptides. As quantitative MS/MS information is generated for all observable peptides in the sample, the missing data and variability between replicates are substantially reduced when compared to a Data-Dependent Acquisition approach. To identify each peptide from the high complexity of the MS/MS spectra generated from multiple peptides, a comprehensive reference spectral library derived prior from a similar sample by Data-Dependent Acquisition, rather than a conventional genome-wide database, should be used. In this chapter, we describe a general protocol that benefits from the advances of SWATH-MS for the quantification of the primary neuronal culture proteome.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationNeuroproteomics
EditorsKa Wan Li
PublisherHumana Press Inc.
Pages119-127
Number of pages9
Edition2nd
ISBN (Electronic)9781493996629
ISBN (Print)9781493996612, 9781493996643
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019

Publication series

NameNeuromethods
Volume146
ISSN (Print)0893-2336
ISSN (Electronic)1940-6045

Keywords

  • DIA
  • Neuron
  • Primary culture
  • Quantitative proteomics
  • SWATH-MS

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Data-Independent acquisition (SWATH) mass spectrometry analysis of protein content in primary neuronal cultures'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this