Dating a Synthetic Character is Like Dating a Man

Johan F. Hoorn, Elly A. Konijn, Matthijs A. Pontier

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

To evaluate our emotionally intelligent software, we put a virtual human capable of speech and facial expressions to an updated and enriched version of the traditional Turing test. In a speed-date with 54 young females, either our software or human confederates controlled the simulation of the virtual human’s affective performance. Results were obtained with frequentist analysis and Bayesian structural equation modeling. Indeed, participants did not detect differences and observed similarity in the emotional behavior of the virtual human and in the way it assumingly perceived them. Additionally, participants did not recognize different but similar cognitive-affective structures between humans and our system. As is, designers may use our software for believable affective virtual humans or robots. Moreover, as far as the richness of interaction possibilities in the speed-dating session allowed, our software seems to reproduce human cognitive-affective structures.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)235-253
Number of pages19
JournalInternational Journal of Social Robotics
Volume11
Issue number2
Early online date31 Oct 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2019

Fingerprint

Robots

Keywords

  • Affective computing
  • Bayesian analysis
  • Cognitive models
  • Social agents
  • Turing test

Cite this

@article{a2f7485a2b19461b8180333088f0ff54,
title = "Dating a Synthetic Character is Like Dating a Man",
abstract = "To evaluate our emotionally intelligent software, we put a virtual human capable of speech and facial expressions to an updated and enriched version of the traditional Turing test. In a speed-date with 54 young females, either our software or human confederates controlled the simulation of the virtual human’s affective performance. Results were obtained with frequentist analysis and Bayesian structural equation modeling. Indeed, participants did not detect differences and observed similarity in the emotional behavior of the virtual human and in the way it assumingly perceived them. Additionally, participants did not recognize different but similar cognitive-affective structures between humans and our system. As is, designers may use our software for believable affective virtual humans or robots. Moreover, as far as the richness of interaction possibilities in the speed-dating session allowed, our software seems to reproduce human cognitive-affective structures.",
keywords = "Affective computing, Bayesian analysis, Cognitive models, Social agents, Turing test",
author = "Hoorn, {Johan F.} and Konijn, {Elly A.} and Pontier, {Matthijs A.}",
year = "2019",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1007/s12369-018-0496-1",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
pages = "235--253",
journal = "International Journal of Social Robotics",
issn = "1875-4791",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "2",

}

Dating a Synthetic Character is Like Dating a Man. / Hoorn, Johan F.; Konijn, Elly A.; Pontier, Matthijs A.

In: International Journal of Social Robotics, Vol. 11, No. 2, 04.2019, p. 235-253.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Dating a Synthetic Character is Like Dating a Man

AU - Hoorn, Johan F.

AU - Konijn, Elly A.

AU - Pontier, Matthijs A.

PY - 2019/4

Y1 - 2019/4

N2 - To evaluate our emotionally intelligent software, we put a virtual human capable of speech and facial expressions to an updated and enriched version of the traditional Turing test. In a speed-date with 54 young females, either our software or human confederates controlled the simulation of the virtual human’s affective performance. Results were obtained with frequentist analysis and Bayesian structural equation modeling. Indeed, participants did not detect differences and observed similarity in the emotional behavior of the virtual human and in the way it assumingly perceived them. Additionally, participants did not recognize different but similar cognitive-affective structures between humans and our system. As is, designers may use our software for believable affective virtual humans or robots. Moreover, as far as the richness of interaction possibilities in the speed-dating session allowed, our software seems to reproduce human cognitive-affective structures.

AB - To evaluate our emotionally intelligent software, we put a virtual human capable of speech and facial expressions to an updated and enriched version of the traditional Turing test. In a speed-date with 54 young females, either our software or human confederates controlled the simulation of the virtual human’s affective performance. Results were obtained with frequentist analysis and Bayesian structural equation modeling. Indeed, participants did not detect differences and observed similarity in the emotional behavior of the virtual human and in the way it assumingly perceived them. Additionally, participants did not recognize different but similar cognitive-affective structures between humans and our system. As is, designers may use our software for believable affective virtual humans or robots. Moreover, as far as the richness of interaction possibilities in the speed-dating session allowed, our software seems to reproduce human cognitive-affective structures.

KW - Affective computing

KW - Bayesian analysis

KW - Cognitive models

KW - Social agents

KW - Turing test

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85064535119&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85064535119&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s12369-018-0496-1

DO - 10.1007/s12369-018-0496-1

M3 - Article

VL - 11

SP - 235

EP - 253

JO - International Journal of Social Robotics

JF - International Journal of Social Robotics

SN - 1875-4791

IS - 2

ER -