TY - CHAP
T1 - Dating the Anthropocene
AU - Pattberg, P.H.
AU - Davies Venn, Michael
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - The Anthropocene has become a widely discussed narrative for our relationship with the natural environment and planet Earth, both in popular culture and across many scientific disciplines. However, the Anthropocene has not yet been officially recognized by the International Union of Geological Sciences and its International Commission on Stratigraphy. In this chapter, we argue that deciding on an appropriate start date and related marker is more than a technical-administrative act, because this decision enables different narratives of the Anthropocene, which, depending on the choices made, will shape future governance and societal debates. In particular and irrespective of the actual formal decision by the relevant scientific authorities, alternative dates matter, as they discursively broaden ideas around the Anthropocene. Consequently, we analyze five suggested start dates (Pleistocene fire; early Anthropocene; Orbis hypothesis; Industrial revolution; Great acceleration) along the following questions: What golden spike/GSSP is proposed? Which activity caused it? Who was the main agent behind that activity? What were the immediate impacts of that activity and how are these impacts evaluated by audiences today? And finally, what possible governance responses are related to a specific start date? Our chapter concludes with suggesting overarching narratives to capture each start date, marker and possible governance implications.
AB - The Anthropocene has become a widely discussed narrative for our relationship with the natural environment and planet Earth, both in popular culture and across many scientific disciplines. However, the Anthropocene has not yet been officially recognized by the International Union of Geological Sciences and its International Commission on Stratigraphy. In this chapter, we argue that deciding on an appropriate start date and related marker is more than a technical-administrative act, because this decision enables different narratives of the Anthropocene, which, depending on the choices made, will shape future governance and societal debates. In particular and irrespective of the actual formal decision by the relevant scientific authorities, alternative dates matter, as they discursively broaden ideas around the Anthropocene. Consequently, we analyze five suggested start dates (Pleistocene fire; early Anthropocene; Orbis hypothesis; Industrial revolution; Great acceleration) along the following questions: What golden spike/GSSP is proposed? Which activity caused it? Who was the main agent behind that activity? What were the immediate impacts of that activity and how are these impacts evaluated by audiences today? And finally, what possible governance responses are related to a specific start date? Our chapter concludes with suggesting overarching narratives to capture each start date, marker and possible governance implications.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85096079256&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85096079256&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://www.routledge.com/The-Anthropocenic-Turn-The-Interplay-between-Disciplinary-and-Interdisciplinary/DURBECK-HUPKES/p/book/9780367480158
U2 - 10.4324/9781003037620-10
DO - 10.4324/9781003037620-10
M3 - Chapter
AN - SCOPUS:85096079256
SN - 9780367480158
T3 - Routledge interdisciplinary perspectives on literature
SP - 70
EP - 89
BT - The Anthropocenic Turn
A2 - Duerbeck, Gabriele
A2 - Huepkes, Philip
PB - Routledge
CY - New York
ER -