Dealing with austerity measures within armed forces: The Dutch case

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

This article studies how Dutch military personnel respond to austerity-related discontent. Based on the online survey (N = 579) conducted among military personnel we investigate 4 response strategies to austerity measures applied in the Dutch armed forces: voice (collective protest), exit (leaving the organization), silence (deliberately deciding not to protest), and neglect (engaging in anti-organizational behavior). We focus on how personnel combine these strategies and apply cluster analysis to identify 6 typical response patterns that we label as protesters, escapers, quiescents, conformers, obstructionists and combaters. We investigate how personal characteristics and perception of unique military environment influence the response of military personnel. We conclude that clusters we described are not only distinct in their behavior—their personal characteristics and perceptions differ as well.

LanguageEnglish
Pages321-334
Number of pages14
JournalMilitary Psychology
Volume30
Issue number4
Early online date30 Jul 2018
DOIs
StatePublished - 2018

Keywords

  • Austerity
  • discontent
  • protest
  • voice
  • exit
  • silence
  • neglect
  • Netherlands

Cite this

@article{f4def9ca45154692931eeb8afad1e732,
title = "Dealing with austerity measures within armed forces: The Dutch case",
abstract = "This article studies how Dutch military personnel respond to austerity-related discontent. Based on the online survey (N = 579) conducted among military personnel we investigate 4 response strategies to austerity measures applied in the Dutch armed forces: voice (collective protest), exit (leaving the organization), silence (deliberately deciding not to protest), and neglect (engaging in anti-organizational behavior). We focus on how personnel combine these strategies and apply cluster analysis to identify 6 typical response patterns that we label as protesters, escapers, quiescents, conformers, obstructionists and combaters. We investigate how personal characteristics and perception of unique military environment influence the response of military personnel. We conclude that clusters we described are not only distinct in their behavior—their personal characteristics and perceptions differ as well.",
keywords = "Austerity, discontent, protest, voice, exit, silence, neglect, Netherlands",
author = "Igor Petrovic and {van Stekelenburg}, Jacquelien and Bert Klandermans",
year = "2018",
doi = "10.1080/08995605.2018.1478536",
language = "English",
volume = "30",
pages = "321--334",
journal = "Military Psychology",
issn = "0899-5605",
publisher = "American Psychological Association",
number = "4",

}

Dealing with austerity measures within armed forces : The Dutch case. / Petrovic, Igor; van Stekelenburg, Jacquelien; Klandermans, Bert.

In: Military Psychology, Vol. 30, No. 4, 2018, p. 321-334.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Dealing with austerity measures within armed forces

T2 - Military Psychology

AU - Petrovic,Igor

AU - van Stekelenburg,Jacquelien

AU - Klandermans,Bert

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - This article studies how Dutch military personnel respond to austerity-related discontent. Based on the online survey (N = 579) conducted among military personnel we investigate 4 response strategies to austerity measures applied in the Dutch armed forces: voice (collective protest), exit (leaving the organization), silence (deliberately deciding not to protest), and neglect (engaging in anti-organizational behavior). We focus on how personnel combine these strategies and apply cluster analysis to identify 6 typical response patterns that we label as protesters, escapers, quiescents, conformers, obstructionists and combaters. We investigate how personal characteristics and perception of unique military environment influence the response of military personnel. We conclude that clusters we described are not only distinct in their behavior—their personal characteristics and perceptions differ as well.

AB - This article studies how Dutch military personnel respond to austerity-related discontent. Based on the online survey (N = 579) conducted among military personnel we investigate 4 response strategies to austerity measures applied in the Dutch armed forces: voice (collective protest), exit (leaving the organization), silence (deliberately deciding not to protest), and neglect (engaging in anti-organizational behavior). We focus on how personnel combine these strategies and apply cluster analysis to identify 6 typical response patterns that we label as protesters, escapers, quiescents, conformers, obstructionists and combaters. We investigate how personal characteristics and perception of unique military environment influence the response of military personnel. We conclude that clusters we described are not only distinct in their behavior—their personal characteristics and perceptions differ as well.

KW - Austerity

KW - discontent

KW - protest

KW - voice

KW - exit

KW - silence

KW - neglect

KW - Netherlands

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85057021947&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85057021947&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/08995605.2018.1478536

DO - 10.1080/08995605.2018.1478536

M3 - Article

VL - 30

SP - 321

EP - 334

JO - Military Psychology

JF - Military Psychology

SN - 0899-5605

IS - 4

ER -