Abstract
Misinformation thrives on social media, prompting much research into social media interventions such as debunks. This paper tests debunking’s effectiveness against an understudied but prominent form of online misinformation: misleading organizational claims of corporate social responsibility, or CSR-washing. British participants (N = 657) took part in a preregistered experiment with a 2 (debunk: present, absent) x 3 (CSR-washing: greenwashing, bluewashing, purplewashing) between-subjects design. They saw an Instagram ad from a fictional clothing company that showcased its dedication to environmental sustainability, gender equality in the workplace, or the elimination of child labor. Half of the participants then received a debunk. Unlike most previous research which showed continued influence of misinformation after debunking, we found that the debunks were very effective: they reversed the persuasive effects of CSR-washing, resulting in negative brand attitudes and low purchase intentions. Several explanations for this finding are discussed, highlighting CSR-washing’s distinctiveness from many other forms of misinformation.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 333-356 |
| Number of pages | 24 |
| Journal | New Media and Society |
| Volume | 28 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| Early online date | 28 Oct 2024 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Jan 2026 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© The Author(s) 2024.
Keywords
- Bluewashing
- correction
- debunk
- disinformation
- fact-check
- greenwashing
- misinformation
- purplewashing
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Debunking the corporate paint shop: Examining the effects of misleading corporate social responsibility claims on social media'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver