Decision importance as a cue for deferral

Job M.T. Krijnen, Marcel Zeelenberg, Seger M. Breugelmans

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

A series of 7 experiments found that people defer important decisions more than unimportant decisions, and that this is independent of choice set composition. This finding persists even when deferral does not provide more flexibility (Experiment 2), when deferral has potential disadvantages (Experiment 3), and when deferral has no material benefits and is financially costly (Experiment 4). The effect of importance on deferral was independent of potential choice conflict (Experiment 5 & 6). The only exception was a situation in which one alternative was clearly dominant; here decision importance did not affect the likelihood of deferral (Experiment 7). These results suggest that people use decision importance as a cue for deferral: more important decisions should take more time and effort.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)407-415
Number of pages9
JournalJudgment and Decision Making
Volume10
Issue number5
Publication statusPublished - 1 Sept 2015

Keywords

  • Choice conflict
  • Decision importance
  • Deferral
  • Heuristics

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Decision importance as a cue for deferral'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this