Decision support for participatory wetland decision making

H. Goosen, R. Janssen, J.E. Vermaat

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Decision support systems can be helpful tools in wetland planning and management. Decision support systems can contribute to efficient exchange of information between experts, stakeholders, decision makers and laypeople. However, the achievements of decision support systems are repeatedly being reported as modest. The objective of this article is to specify the roles and requirements of decision support tools in wetland planning. Why do such tools often fail and how can they be improved? Too often, systems are developed from a technological developers' push (supply-driven) rather than through a demand-driven process where the need for certain technologies to effectively support decision processes is being specified. It is questioned whether (often technocratic) tools are still equipped to support the complex planning and management process where different stakeholders interact. Two tools are described, which have been developed to facilitate negotiations in wetland planning and both tend to be less data-driven and more directed to play a role in participatory processes. From experiences with the development of the two decision support efforts we derive suggestions for improvement. The first tool uses spatial multi-criteria analysis techniques, to enable a structured analysis of the diversity of the water management issues. The second tool focuses on interactive design and spatial negotiation. It is concluded that application of this category of tools can be promising in early phases of decision-making. Their main contribution is to help to overcome unnecessary conflicts, to stimulate collaborative planning, to structure the problem and to provide insight in values and preferences of stakeholders involved. © 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)187-199
Number of pages13
JournalEcological Engineering
Volume30
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2007

Fingerprint

Wetlands
Decision making
wetland
decision making
decision support system
stakeholder
Planning
Decision support systems
tool use
water management
decision
planning
Water management
analysis

Cite this

Goosen, H. ; Janssen, R. ; Vermaat, J.E. / Decision support for participatory wetland decision making. In: Ecological Engineering. 2007 ; Vol. 30. pp. 187-199.
@article{95ae6978f4044286900ac0fd0da8a5f2,
title = "Decision support for participatory wetland decision making",
abstract = "Decision support systems can be helpful tools in wetland planning and management. Decision support systems can contribute to efficient exchange of information between experts, stakeholders, decision makers and laypeople. However, the achievements of decision support systems are repeatedly being reported as modest. The objective of this article is to specify the roles and requirements of decision support tools in wetland planning. Why do such tools often fail and how can they be improved? Too often, systems are developed from a technological developers' push (supply-driven) rather than through a demand-driven process where the need for certain technologies to effectively support decision processes is being specified. It is questioned whether (often technocratic) tools are still equipped to support the complex planning and management process where different stakeholders interact. Two tools are described, which have been developed to facilitate negotiations in wetland planning and both tend to be less data-driven and more directed to play a role in participatory processes. From experiences with the development of the two decision support efforts we derive suggestions for improvement. The first tool uses spatial multi-criteria analysis techniques, to enable a structured analysis of the diversity of the water management issues. The second tool focuses on interactive design and spatial negotiation. It is concluded that application of this category of tools can be promising in early phases of decision-making. Their main contribution is to help to overcome unnecessary conflicts, to stimulate collaborative planning, to structure the problem and to provide insight in values and preferences of stakeholders involved. {\circledC} 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.",
author = "H. Goosen and R. Janssen and J.E. Vermaat",
year = "2007",
doi = "10.1016/j.ecoleng.2006.11.004",
language = "English",
volume = "30",
pages = "187--199",
journal = "Ecological Engineering",
issn = "0925-8574",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Decision support for participatory wetland decision making. / Goosen, H.; Janssen, R.; Vermaat, J.E.

In: Ecological Engineering, Vol. 30, 2007, p. 187-199.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Decision support for participatory wetland decision making

AU - Goosen, H.

AU - Janssen, R.

AU - Vermaat, J.E.

PY - 2007

Y1 - 2007

N2 - Decision support systems can be helpful tools in wetland planning and management. Decision support systems can contribute to efficient exchange of information between experts, stakeholders, decision makers and laypeople. However, the achievements of decision support systems are repeatedly being reported as modest. The objective of this article is to specify the roles and requirements of decision support tools in wetland planning. Why do such tools often fail and how can they be improved? Too often, systems are developed from a technological developers' push (supply-driven) rather than through a demand-driven process where the need for certain technologies to effectively support decision processes is being specified. It is questioned whether (often technocratic) tools are still equipped to support the complex planning and management process where different stakeholders interact. Two tools are described, which have been developed to facilitate negotiations in wetland planning and both tend to be less data-driven and more directed to play a role in participatory processes. From experiences with the development of the two decision support efforts we derive suggestions for improvement. The first tool uses spatial multi-criteria analysis techniques, to enable a structured analysis of the diversity of the water management issues. The second tool focuses on interactive design and spatial negotiation. It is concluded that application of this category of tools can be promising in early phases of decision-making. Their main contribution is to help to overcome unnecessary conflicts, to stimulate collaborative planning, to structure the problem and to provide insight in values and preferences of stakeholders involved. © 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

AB - Decision support systems can be helpful tools in wetland planning and management. Decision support systems can contribute to efficient exchange of information between experts, stakeholders, decision makers and laypeople. However, the achievements of decision support systems are repeatedly being reported as modest. The objective of this article is to specify the roles and requirements of decision support tools in wetland planning. Why do such tools often fail and how can they be improved? Too often, systems are developed from a technological developers' push (supply-driven) rather than through a demand-driven process where the need for certain technologies to effectively support decision processes is being specified. It is questioned whether (often technocratic) tools are still equipped to support the complex planning and management process where different stakeholders interact. Two tools are described, which have been developed to facilitate negotiations in wetland planning and both tend to be less data-driven and more directed to play a role in participatory processes. From experiences with the development of the two decision support efforts we derive suggestions for improvement. The first tool uses spatial multi-criteria analysis techniques, to enable a structured analysis of the diversity of the water management issues. The second tool focuses on interactive design and spatial negotiation. It is concluded that application of this category of tools can be promising in early phases of decision-making. Their main contribution is to help to overcome unnecessary conflicts, to stimulate collaborative planning, to structure the problem and to provide insight in values and preferences of stakeholders involved. © 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

U2 - 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2006.11.004

DO - 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2006.11.004

M3 - Article

VL - 30

SP - 187

EP - 199

JO - Ecological Engineering

JF - Ecological Engineering

SN - 0925-8574

ER -