Decisions in motion: passive body acceleration modulates hand choice

Romy S. Bakker, R.H.A. Weijer, R.J. van Beers, L.P.J. Selen, W.P. Medendorp

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

n everyday life, we frequently have to decide which hand to use for a certain action. It has been suggested that for this decision the brain calculates expected costs based on action values, such as expected biomechanical costs, expected success rate, handedness, and skillfulness. Although these conclusions were based on experiments in stationary subjects, we often act while the body is in motion. We investigated how hand choice is affected by passive body motion, which directly affects the biomechanical costs of the arm movement due to its inertia. With the use of a linear motion platform, 12 right-handed subjects were sinusoidally translated (0.625 and 0.5 Hz). At 8 possible motion phases, they had to reach, using either their left or right hand, to a target presented at 1 of 11 possible locations. We predicted hand choice by calculating the expected biomechanical costs under differ- ent assumptions about the future acceleration involved in these com- putations, being the forthcoming acceleration during the reach, the instantaneous acceleration at target onset, or zero acceleration as if the body were stationary. Although hand choice was generally biased to use of the dominant hand, it also modulated sinusoidally with the motion, with the amplitude of the bias depending on the motion’s peak acceleration. The phase of hand choice modulation was consistent with the cost model that took the instantaneous acceleration signal at target onset. This suggests that the brain relies on the bottom-up acceleration signals, and not on predictions about future accelerations, when deciding on hand choice during passive whole body motion.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2250–2261
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Neurophysiology
Volume117
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Fingerprint

Hand
Costs and Cost Analysis
Functional Laterality
Brain
Arm

Keywords

  • biomechanical cost; decision making; hand choice; self-motion; vestibular system

Cite this

Bakker, Romy S. ; Weijer, R.H.A. ; van Beers, R.J. ; Selen, L.P.J. ; Medendorp, W.P. / Decisions in motion: passive body acceleration modulates hand choice. In: Journal of Neurophysiology. 2017 ; Vol. 117, No. 6. pp. 2250–2261.
@article{35a7104bde5e4892a9bc8acd749b8376,
title = "Decisions in motion: passive body acceleration modulates hand choice",
abstract = "n everyday life, we frequently have to decide which hand to use for a certain action. It has been suggested that for this decision the brain calculates expected costs based on action values, such as expected biomechanical costs, expected success rate, handedness, and skillfulness. Although these conclusions were based on experiments in stationary subjects, we often act while the body is in motion. We investigated how hand choice is affected by passive body motion, which directly affects the biomechanical costs of the arm movement due to its inertia. With the use of a linear motion platform, 12 right-handed subjects were sinusoidally translated (0.625 and 0.5 Hz). At 8 possible motion phases, they had to reach, using either their left or right hand, to a target presented at 1 of 11 possible locations. We predicted hand choice by calculating the expected biomechanical costs under differ- ent assumptions about the future acceleration involved in these com- putations, being the forthcoming acceleration during the reach, the instantaneous acceleration at target onset, or zero acceleration as if the body were stationary. Although hand choice was generally biased to use of the dominant hand, it also modulated sinusoidally with the motion, with the amplitude of the bias depending on the motion’s peak acceleration. The phase of hand choice modulation was consistent with the cost model that took the instantaneous acceleration signal at target onset. This suggests that the brain relies on the bottom-up acceleration signals, and not on predictions about future accelerations, when deciding on hand choice during passive whole body motion.",
keywords = "biomechanical cost; decision making; hand choice; self-motion; vestibular system",
author = "Bakker, {Romy S.} and R.H.A. Weijer and {van Beers}, R.J. and L.P.J. Selen and W.P. Medendorp",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1152/jn.00022.2017",
language = "English",
volume = "117",
pages = "2250–2261",
journal = "Journal of Neurophysiology",
issn = "0022-3077",
publisher = "American Physiological Society",
number = "6",

}

Decisions in motion: passive body acceleration modulates hand choice. / Bakker, Romy S.; Weijer, R.H.A.; van Beers, R.J.; Selen, L.P.J.; Medendorp, W.P.

In: Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol. 117, No. 6, 2017, p. 2250–2261.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Decisions in motion: passive body acceleration modulates hand choice

AU - Bakker, Romy S.

AU - Weijer, R.H.A.

AU - van Beers, R.J.

AU - Selen, L.P.J.

AU - Medendorp, W.P.

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - n everyday life, we frequently have to decide which hand to use for a certain action. It has been suggested that for this decision the brain calculates expected costs based on action values, such as expected biomechanical costs, expected success rate, handedness, and skillfulness. Although these conclusions were based on experiments in stationary subjects, we often act while the body is in motion. We investigated how hand choice is affected by passive body motion, which directly affects the biomechanical costs of the arm movement due to its inertia. With the use of a linear motion platform, 12 right-handed subjects were sinusoidally translated (0.625 and 0.5 Hz). At 8 possible motion phases, they had to reach, using either their left or right hand, to a target presented at 1 of 11 possible locations. We predicted hand choice by calculating the expected biomechanical costs under differ- ent assumptions about the future acceleration involved in these com- putations, being the forthcoming acceleration during the reach, the instantaneous acceleration at target onset, or zero acceleration as if the body were stationary. Although hand choice was generally biased to use of the dominant hand, it also modulated sinusoidally with the motion, with the amplitude of the bias depending on the motion’s peak acceleration. The phase of hand choice modulation was consistent with the cost model that took the instantaneous acceleration signal at target onset. This suggests that the brain relies on the bottom-up acceleration signals, and not on predictions about future accelerations, when deciding on hand choice during passive whole body motion.

AB - n everyday life, we frequently have to decide which hand to use for a certain action. It has been suggested that for this decision the brain calculates expected costs based on action values, such as expected biomechanical costs, expected success rate, handedness, and skillfulness. Although these conclusions were based on experiments in stationary subjects, we often act while the body is in motion. We investigated how hand choice is affected by passive body motion, which directly affects the biomechanical costs of the arm movement due to its inertia. With the use of a linear motion platform, 12 right-handed subjects were sinusoidally translated (0.625 and 0.5 Hz). At 8 possible motion phases, they had to reach, using either their left or right hand, to a target presented at 1 of 11 possible locations. We predicted hand choice by calculating the expected biomechanical costs under differ- ent assumptions about the future acceleration involved in these com- putations, being the forthcoming acceleration during the reach, the instantaneous acceleration at target onset, or zero acceleration as if the body were stationary. Although hand choice was generally biased to use of the dominant hand, it also modulated sinusoidally with the motion, with the amplitude of the bias depending on the motion’s peak acceleration. The phase of hand choice modulation was consistent with the cost model that took the instantaneous acceleration signal at target onset. This suggests that the brain relies on the bottom-up acceleration signals, and not on predictions about future accelerations, when deciding on hand choice during passive whole body motion.

KW - biomechanical cost; decision making; hand choice; self-motion; vestibular system

U2 - 10.1152/jn.00022.2017

DO - 10.1152/jn.00022.2017

M3 - Article

VL - 117

SP - 2250

EP - 2261

JO - Journal of Neurophysiology

JF - Journal of Neurophysiology

SN - 0022-3077

IS - 6

ER -