Abstract
A growing literature on the impact of “fake news“accusations on legacy news outlets suggests that the use of this term is part of a much larger trend of increased and delegitimizing media criticism by political actors. However, so far, there is very little empirical evidence on how prevailing politicians' delegitimizing media criticism really is and under which conditions it occurs. To fill these gaps, we present results of a content analysis of media-related Facebook postings by Austrian and German politicians in 2017 (N=2,921). The results suggest that media criticism, in general, is actually rare and that about half of it can be described as delegitimizing (i.e., characterized by incivility or absence of argumentation). Most often, media criticism is used by populist politicians, who accuse “the media” in general of bias and falsehoods.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 653-675 |
Number of pages | 23 |
Journal | Journal of Language and Politics |
Volume | 20 |
Issue number | 5 |
Early online date | 15 May 2021 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 20 Sept 2021 |
Bibliographical note
Funding Information:This research was funded (“Förderungsstipendium”)
Publisher Copyright:
© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Copyright:
Copyright 2021 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
Keywords
- Content analysis
- Delegitimization
- Fake news
- Media criticism
- Populist communication
- Social media