Demonstration projects of Nearly Zero Energy Buildings: Lessons from end-user experiences in Amsterdam, Helsingborg, and Lyon

N.M. van der Grijp, K.F. van der Woerd, B. Gaiddon, R.M. Hummelshøj, M. Larsson, O. Osunmuyiwa, R. Rooth

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Nearly Zero Energy Buildings (NZEBs) have been positioned as a low carbon strategy by the European Union in its Directive on the Energy Performance of Buildings (Directive 2010/31/EU). Underlying this directive is that the choice of technical options as well as sources of renewable energy may vary across EU countries and building projects. This article aims to compare the outcomes of NZEB demonstration projects in newly built city districts in Amsterdam, Helsingborg, and Lyon, using insights from strategic niche management theory combined with post-occupancy evaluation. More specifically, the analysis focuses on end-user expectations and experiences with living in energy-neutral city districts and homes, identifying lessons learned. A major conclusion is that the NZEB demonstration projects only facilitated single loop learning of end-users but did not provide an impetus for double loop learning. The findings suggest that NZEB projects need to be redesigned to facilitate more active roles of end-users in order to help realising their full potential in terms of increased energy efficiency and social learning.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)10-15
Number of pages6
JournalEnergy Research & Social Science
Volume49
Early online date19 Nov 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2019

Keywords

  • Nearly Zero Energy Buildings
  • Strategic niche management
  • Post-occupancy evaluation
  • Inclusive governance
  • Social learning
  • End-user empowerment

VU Research Profile

  • Science for Sustainability

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Demonstration projects of Nearly Zero Energy Buildings: Lessons from end-user experiences in Amsterdam, Helsingborg, and Lyon'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this