Abstract
For historians of science, the question of how to write about ‘heroes’ in science is related to other methodological questions: What is science? What is ‘good’ science and therefore a ‘good’ scientist? What phenomena are worthy of study? What is the relationship between an individual and his or her context? The issue of ‘heroes’ specifically occasioned a watershed between many early twentieth-century historians of science and earlier generations of (lay) historians. Reijer Hooykaas (1906-1994) was among this new generation of historians. I describe and explain the changing ways in which, broadly speaking, twentieth-century historians of science have conceived of ‘heroes’ in science. I use Hooykaas as a looking glass through which to describe the broader historiographical developments.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Nobel Genius |
| Subtitle of host publication | Prizes, Prestige and Scientific Practice |
| Editors | Nils Hansson, Ad Maas |
| Publisher | Leiden University |
| Chapter | 6 |
| Pages | 115-140 |
| Number of pages | 26 |
| ISBN (Electronic) | 9789400604582 |
| ISBN (Print) | 9789087284138 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2024 |
Keywords
- Reijer Hooykaas
- history of science
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Demythologizing Science: Reijer Hooykaas on Hero Worship as “Undesirable” and “Disdaining”'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver