TY - GEN
T1 - Dental implant register
T2 - Summary and consensus statements of group 2. The 5 th EAO Consensus Conference 2018
AU - Klinge, Björn
AU - Sanz, Mariano
AU - Alcoforado, Gil
AU - Bienz, Stefan P.
AU - Cosyn, Jan
AU - De Bruyn, Hugo
AU - Derks, Jan
AU - Figuero, Elena
AU - Gurzawska, Katarzyna
AU - Heitz-Mayfield, Lisa
AU - Jung, Ronald E.
AU - Ornekul, Turker
AU - Sagado, Alberto
PY - 2018/10/1
Y1 - 2018/10/1
N2 - Objectives: This publication reports the EAO Workshop group-2 and consensus plenary discussions and statements on a narrative review providing the background and possible facilities and importance of a dental implant register, to allow for a systematic follow-up of the clinical outcome of dental implant treatment in various clinical settings. It should be observed that the format of the review and the subsequent consensus report consciously departs from conventional consensus publications and reports. Material and methods: The publication was a narrative review on the presence and significance of quality registers regarding select medical conditions and procedures. The group discussed and evaluated the publication and made corrections and recommendations to the authors and agreed on the statements and recommendations described in this consensus report. Results: Possible registrations to be included in an implant register were discussed and agreed as a preliminary basis for further development, meaning that additional parameters be included or some be deleted. Conclusions: It was agreed to bring the idea of an implant quality register, including the presented results of discussions and proposals by the group- and plenary sessions, to the EAO Board for further discussion and decision.
AB - Objectives: This publication reports the EAO Workshop group-2 and consensus plenary discussions and statements on a narrative review providing the background and possible facilities and importance of a dental implant register, to allow for a systematic follow-up of the clinical outcome of dental implant treatment in various clinical settings. It should be observed that the format of the review and the subsequent consensus report consciously departs from conventional consensus publications and reports. Material and methods: The publication was a narrative review on the presence and significance of quality registers regarding select medical conditions and procedures. The group discussed and evaluated the publication and made corrections and recommendations to the authors and agreed on the statements and recommendations described in this consensus report. Results: Possible registrations to be included in an implant register were discussed and agreed as a preliminary basis for further development, meaning that additional parameters be included or some be deleted. Conclusions: It was agreed to bring the idea of an implant quality register, including the presented results of discussions and proposals by the group- and plenary sessions, to the EAO Board for further discussion and decision.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85054775381&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/clr.13269
DO - 10.1111/clr.13269
M3 - Conference contribution
VL - 29
T3 - Clinical Oral Implants Research
SP - 157
EP - 159
BT - Clinical Oral Implants Research
PB - Blackwell Munksgaard
ER -