TY - JOUR
T1 - Developing an evidence-based perspective on interrogation
T2 - A review of the U.S. government's high-value detainee interrogation group research program
AU - Meissner, Christian A.
AU - Oleszkiewicz, Simon
AU - Surmon-Böhr, Frances
AU - Alison, Laurence J.
PY - 2017/11
Y1 - 2017/11
N2 - Interrogation practices in the United States have been roundly criticized both for their accusatorial ethos, at times leading to false confessions by the innocent, and for a history of applying physical and psychological coercion in law enforcement, military, and intelligence contexts. Despite decades of psychological research demonstrating the failures of such approaches and despite recent positive advances in countries such as the United Kingdom moving to an information-gathering framework, little change has occurred in the training or practice of U.S. interrogation professionals over the past 50 years. This article describes recent historical events that have led to the development of the first unclassified, government-funded research program on the science of interviewing and interrogation. Since 2010, the High-Value Detainee Interrogation Group (HIG) research program has identified effective approaches for developing cooperation and rapport, eliciting information, challenging inconsistencies by presenting evidence or information strategically, and assessing credibility using cognitive cues and strategic questioning tactics. The program has also examined the influence of culture and language, and has facilitated the translation of research from the laboratory to the field. In this context, we review the significant contributions of psychologists to understanding and developing ethical, legal, and effective interrogation practices, and we describe important future directions for research on investigative interviewing and interrogation.
AB - Interrogation practices in the United States have been roundly criticized both for their accusatorial ethos, at times leading to false confessions by the innocent, and for a history of applying physical and psychological coercion in law enforcement, military, and intelligence contexts. Despite decades of psychological research demonstrating the failures of such approaches and despite recent positive advances in countries such as the United Kingdom moving to an information-gathering framework, little change has occurred in the training or practice of U.S. interrogation professionals over the past 50 years. This article describes recent historical events that have led to the development of the first unclassified, government-funded research program on the science of interviewing and interrogation. Since 2010, the High-Value Detainee Interrogation Group (HIG) research program has identified effective approaches for developing cooperation and rapport, eliciting information, challenging inconsistencies by presenting evidence or information strategically, and assessing credibility using cognitive cues and strategic questioning tactics. The program has also examined the influence of culture and language, and has facilitated the translation of research from the laboratory to the field. In this context, we review the significant contributions of psychologists to understanding and developing ethical, legal, and effective interrogation practices, and we describe important future directions for research on investigative interviewing and interrogation.
KW - Assessment
KW - Confessions
KW - Credibility
KW - Interrogation
KW - Interviewing
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85032924092&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85032924092&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1037/law0000136
DO - 10.1037/law0000136
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85032924092
SN - 1076-8971
VL - 23
SP - 438
EP - 457
JO - Psychology, Public Policy, and Law
JF - Psychology, Public Policy, and Law
IS - 4
ER -