Developing multi-risk DRM pathways — Lessons from four European case studies

Julius Schlumberger*, Andrew Warren, Anne Sophie Daloz, David Geurts, Stefan Hochrainer-Stigler, Lin Ma, Noemi Padrón-Fumero, Karina Reiter, Robert Šakić Trogrlić, Sharon Tatman, Vanessa Banks, Julia Crummy, Jaime Díaz-Pacheco, Pedro Dorta Antequera, Sara García-González, Abel López-Díez, Tamara Lucía Febles Arévalo, David Romero-Manrique, Nikita Strelkovskii, Silvia TorresanAsbjørn Torvanger, Veronica Casartelli, Roxana Ciurean, Judith N. Claassen, Stefania Gottardo, Jeroen C.J.H. Aerts, Marjolijn Haasnoot, Marleen C. de Ruiter

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

In the context of climate change and socioeconomic developments, disaster risk is intensifying, driven not only by more frequent and severe hazard events but also by complex interactions between these events and underlying vulnerabilities. These interactions can amplify impacts and trigger cascading failures across sectors. Using the Canary Islands, the Danube Region, the North Sea, and Scandinavia as four case study regions, this research explores how the Dynamic Adaptive Policy Pathways for Multi-Risk (DAPP-MR) framework can support the development of integrated, adaptive disaster risk management (DRM) strategies to reduce risk while addressing these complex interactions. We examine how DAPP-MR enables a deeper understanding of multi-risk systems, facilitates stakeholder engagement, and structures the development of robust, cross-sectoral DRM pathways in these four qualitative applications. The findings indicate that DAPP-MR enables integrated, cross-sectoral thinking and encourages balancing short-term priorities and long-term needs. This research demonstrates that DAPP-MR offers a structured approach to unravelling the complex dynamics between hazards and sectors, while maintaining flexibility in analytical focus. This flexibility allows context-specific priorities to guide the analysis, but it can also make comparing outcomes across different applications more challenging. This study further underscores the need for additional tools to manage and explore the information to support the development and evaluation of multi-risk DRM pathways.

Original languageEnglish
Article number100753
Pages (from-to)1-23
Number of pages23
JournalClimate Risk Management
Volume50
Early online date21 Oct 2025
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2025

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY license. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Keywords

  • Adaptive pathways
  • Climate adaptation
  • DAPP-MR
  • Disaster risk management
  • Multi-hazard
  • Multi-risk
  • Multi-sector
  • Qualitative case studies
  • Stakeholder engagement

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Developing multi-risk DRM pathways — Lessons from four European case studies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this