Developing stakeholder-driven scenarios on land sharing and land sparing – Insights from five European case studies

Katrin Karner, Anna F. Cord, Nina Hagemann, Nuria Hernandez-Mora, Annelie Holzkämper, Bernard Jeangros, Nele Lienhoop, Heike Nitsch, David Rivas, Erwin Schmid, Catharina J.E. Schulp, Michael Strauch, Emma H. van der Zanden, Martin Volk, Barbara Willaarts, Nina Zarrineh, Martin Schönhart

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Empirical research on land sharing and land sparing has been criticized because preferences of local stakeholders, socio-economic aspects, a bundle of ecosystem services and the local context were only rarely integrated. Using storylines and scenarios is a common approach to include land use drivers and local contexts or to cope with the uncertainties of future developments. The objective of the presented research is to develop comparable participatory regional land use scenarios for the year 2030 reflecting land sharing, land sparing and more intermediate developments across five different European landscapes (Austria, Germany, Switzerland, The Netherlands and Spain). In order to ensure methodological consistency among the five case studies, a hierarchical multi-scale scenario approach was developed, which consisted of i)the selection of a common global storyline to frame a common sphere of uncertainty for all case studies, ii)the definition of three contrasting qualitative European storylines (representing developments for land sharing, land sparing and a balanced storyline), and iii)the development of three explorative case study-specific land use scenarios with regional stakeholders in workshops. Land use transition rules defined by stakeholders were used to generate three different spatially-explicit scenarios for each case study by means of high-resolution land use maps. All scenarios incorporated various aspects of land use and management to allow subsequent quantification of multiple ecosystem services and biodiversity indicators. The comparison of the final scenarios showed both common as well as diverging trends among the case studies. For instance, stakeholders identified further possibilities to intensify land management in all case studies in the land sparing scenario. In addition, in most case studies stakeholders agreed on the most preferred scenario, i.e. either land sharing or balanced, and the most likely one, i.e. balanced. However, they expressed some skepticism regarding the general plausibility of land sparing in a European context. It can be concluded that stakeholder perceptions and the local context can be integrated in land sharing and land sparing contexts subject to particular process design principles.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)488-500
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of Environmental Management
Volume241
Early online date9 Apr 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2019

Fingerprint

Land use
stakeholder
land use
Ecosystems
Biodiversity
ecosystem service
land management
land
Process design
Economics
biodiversity
Uncertainty

Keywords

  • Participatory land use scenarios: multi-scale scenarios: sustainable land use: stakeholder engagement: co-production

Cite this

Karner, K., Cord, A. F., Hagemann, N., Hernandez-Mora, N., Holzkämper, A., Jeangros, B., ... Schönhart, M. (2019). Developing stakeholder-driven scenarios on land sharing and land sparing – Insights from five European case studies. Journal of Environmental Management, 241, 488-500. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.03.050
Karner, Katrin ; Cord, Anna F. ; Hagemann, Nina ; Hernandez-Mora, Nuria ; Holzkämper, Annelie ; Jeangros, Bernard ; Lienhoop, Nele ; Nitsch, Heike ; Rivas, David ; Schmid, Erwin ; Schulp, Catharina J.E. ; Strauch, Michael ; van der Zanden, Emma H. ; Volk, Martin ; Willaarts, Barbara ; Zarrineh, Nina ; Schönhart, Martin. / Developing stakeholder-driven scenarios on land sharing and land sparing – Insights from five European case studies. In: Journal of Environmental Management. 2019 ; Vol. 241. pp. 488-500.
@article{cecee938cfaf494f9b4d6ed6c4e75f59,
title = "Developing stakeholder-driven scenarios on land sharing and land sparing – Insights from five European case studies",
abstract = "Empirical research on land sharing and land sparing has been criticized because preferences of local stakeholders, socio-economic aspects, a bundle of ecosystem services and the local context were only rarely integrated. Using storylines and scenarios is a common approach to include land use drivers and local contexts or to cope with the uncertainties of future developments. The objective of the presented research is to develop comparable participatory regional land use scenarios for the year 2030 reflecting land sharing, land sparing and more intermediate developments across five different European landscapes (Austria, Germany, Switzerland, The Netherlands and Spain). In order to ensure methodological consistency among the five case studies, a hierarchical multi-scale scenario approach was developed, which consisted of i)the selection of a common global storyline to frame a common sphere of uncertainty for all case studies, ii)the definition of three contrasting qualitative European storylines (representing developments for land sharing, land sparing and a balanced storyline), and iii)the development of three explorative case study-specific land use scenarios with regional stakeholders in workshops. Land use transition rules defined by stakeholders were used to generate three different spatially-explicit scenarios for each case study by means of high-resolution land use maps. All scenarios incorporated various aspects of land use and management to allow subsequent quantification of multiple ecosystem services and biodiversity indicators. The comparison of the final scenarios showed both common as well as diverging trends among the case studies. For instance, stakeholders identified further possibilities to intensify land management in all case studies in the land sparing scenario. In addition, in most case studies stakeholders agreed on the most preferred scenario, i.e. either land sharing or balanced, and the most likely one, i.e. balanced. However, they expressed some skepticism regarding the general plausibility of land sparing in a European context. It can be concluded that stakeholder perceptions and the local context can be integrated in land sharing and land sparing contexts subject to particular process design principles.",
keywords = "Participatory land use scenarios: multi-scale scenarios: sustainable land use: stakeholder engagement: co-production",
author = "Katrin Karner and Cord, {Anna F.} and Nina Hagemann and Nuria Hernandez-Mora and Annelie Holzk{\"a}mper and Bernard Jeangros and Nele Lienhoop and Heike Nitsch and David Rivas and Erwin Schmid and Schulp, {Catharina J.E.} and Michael Strauch and {van der Zanden}, {Emma H.} and Martin Volk and Barbara Willaarts and Nina Zarrineh and Martin Sch{\"o}nhart",
year = "2019",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.03.050",
language = "English",
volume = "241",
pages = "488--500",
journal = "Journal of Environmental Management",
issn = "0301-4797",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",

}

Karner, K, Cord, AF, Hagemann, N, Hernandez-Mora, N, Holzkämper, A, Jeangros, B, Lienhoop, N, Nitsch, H, Rivas, D, Schmid, E, Schulp, CJE, Strauch, M, van der Zanden, EH, Volk, M, Willaarts, B, Zarrineh, N & Schönhart, M 2019, 'Developing stakeholder-driven scenarios on land sharing and land sparing – Insights from five European case studies' Journal of Environmental Management, vol. 241, pp. 488-500. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.03.050

Developing stakeholder-driven scenarios on land sharing and land sparing – Insights from five European case studies. / Karner, Katrin; Cord, Anna F.; Hagemann, Nina; Hernandez-Mora, Nuria; Holzkämper, Annelie; Jeangros, Bernard; Lienhoop, Nele; Nitsch, Heike; Rivas, David; Schmid, Erwin; Schulp, Catharina J.E.; Strauch, Michael; van der Zanden, Emma H.; Volk, Martin; Willaarts, Barbara; Zarrineh, Nina; Schönhart, Martin.

In: Journal of Environmental Management, Vol. 241, 01.07.2019, p. 488-500.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Developing stakeholder-driven scenarios on land sharing and land sparing – Insights from five European case studies

AU - Karner, Katrin

AU - Cord, Anna F.

AU - Hagemann, Nina

AU - Hernandez-Mora, Nuria

AU - Holzkämper, Annelie

AU - Jeangros, Bernard

AU - Lienhoop, Nele

AU - Nitsch, Heike

AU - Rivas, David

AU - Schmid, Erwin

AU - Schulp, Catharina J.E.

AU - Strauch, Michael

AU - van der Zanden, Emma H.

AU - Volk, Martin

AU - Willaarts, Barbara

AU - Zarrineh, Nina

AU - Schönhart, Martin

PY - 2019/7/1

Y1 - 2019/7/1

N2 - Empirical research on land sharing and land sparing has been criticized because preferences of local stakeholders, socio-economic aspects, a bundle of ecosystem services and the local context were only rarely integrated. Using storylines and scenarios is a common approach to include land use drivers and local contexts or to cope with the uncertainties of future developments. The objective of the presented research is to develop comparable participatory regional land use scenarios for the year 2030 reflecting land sharing, land sparing and more intermediate developments across five different European landscapes (Austria, Germany, Switzerland, The Netherlands and Spain). In order to ensure methodological consistency among the five case studies, a hierarchical multi-scale scenario approach was developed, which consisted of i)the selection of a common global storyline to frame a common sphere of uncertainty for all case studies, ii)the definition of three contrasting qualitative European storylines (representing developments for land sharing, land sparing and a balanced storyline), and iii)the development of three explorative case study-specific land use scenarios with regional stakeholders in workshops. Land use transition rules defined by stakeholders were used to generate three different spatially-explicit scenarios for each case study by means of high-resolution land use maps. All scenarios incorporated various aspects of land use and management to allow subsequent quantification of multiple ecosystem services and biodiversity indicators. The comparison of the final scenarios showed both common as well as diverging trends among the case studies. For instance, stakeholders identified further possibilities to intensify land management in all case studies in the land sparing scenario. In addition, in most case studies stakeholders agreed on the most preferred scenario, i.e. either land sharing or balanced, and the most likely one, i.e. balanced. However, they expressed some skepticism regarding the general plausibility of land sparing in a European context. It can be concluded that stakeholder perceptions and the local context can be integrated in land sharing and land sparing contexts subject to particular process design principles.

AB - Empirical research on land sharing and land sparing has been criticized because preferences of local stakeholders, socio-economic aspects, a bundle of ecosystem services and the local context were only rarely integrated. Using storylines and scenarios is a common approach to include land use drivers and local contexts or to cope with the uncertainties of future developments. The objective of the presented research is to develop comparable participatory regional land use scenarios for the year 2030 reflecting land sharing, land sparing and more intermediate developments across five different European landscapes (Austria, Germany, Switzerland, The Netherlands and Spain). In order to ensure methodological consistency among the five case studies, a hierarchical multi-scale scenario approach was developed, which consisted of i)the selection of a common global storyline to frame a common sphere of uncertainty for all case studies, ii)the definition of three contrasting qualitative European storylines (representing developments for land sharing, land sparing and a balanced storyline), and iii)the development of three explorative case study-specific land use scenarios with regional stakeholders in workshops. Land use transition rules defined by stakeholders were used to generate three different spatially-explicit scenarios for each case study by means of high-resolution land use maps. All scenarios incorporated various aspects of land use and management to allow subsequent quantification of multiple ecosystem services and biodiversity indicators. The comparison of the final scenarios showed both common as well as diverging trends among the case studies. For instance, stakeholders identified further possibilities to intensify land management in all case studies in the land sparing scenario. In addition, in most case studies stakeholders agreed on the most preferred scenario, i.e. either land sharing or balanced, and the most likely one, i.e. balanced. However, they expressed some skepticism regarding the general plausibility of land sparing in a European context. It can be concluded that stakeholder perceptions and the local context can be integrated in land sharing and land sparing contexts subject to particular process design principles.

KW - Participatory land use scenarios: multi-scale scenarios: sustainable land use: stakeholder engagement: co-production

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85065817813&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85065817813&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.03.050

DO - 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.03.050

M3 - Article

VL - 241

SP - 488

EP - 500

JO - Journal of Environmental Management

JF - Journal of Environmental Management

SN - 0301-4797

ER -