Development and validation of the Diagnostic Interview Adjustment Disorder (DIAD)

L.R. Cornelius, S. Brouwer, M.R. de Boer, J.W. Groothoff, J.J.L. van der Klink

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Adjustment disorders (ADs) are under-researched due to the absence of a reliable and valid diagnostic tool. This paper describes the development and content/construct validation of a fully structured interview for the diagnosis of AD, the Diagnostic Interview Adjustment Disorder (DIAD). We developed the DIAD by partly adjusting and operationalizing DSM-IV criteria. Eleven experts were consulted on the content of the DIAD. In addition, the DIAD was administered by trained lay interviewers to a representative sample of disability claimants (n=323). To assess construct validity of the DIAD, we explored the associations between the AD classification by the DIAD and summary scores of the Kessler Psychological Distress 10-item Scale (K10) and the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS) by linear regression. Expert agreement on content of the DIAD was moderate to good. The prevalence of AD using the DIAD with revised criteria for the diagnosis AD was 7.4%. The associations of AD by the DIAD with average sum scores on the K10 and the WHODAS supported construct validity of the DIAD. The results provide a first indication that the DIAD is a valid instrument to diagnose AD. Further studies on reliability and on other aspects of validity are needed. © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)192-207
JournalInternational Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research
Volume23
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Adjustment Disorders
Interviews
Appointments and Schedules

Cite this

Cornelius, L.R. ; Brouwer, S. ; de Boer, M.R. ; Groothoff, J.W. ; van der Klink, J.J.L. / Development and validation of the Diagnostic Interview Adjustment Disorder (DIAD). In: International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research. 2014 ; Vol. 23, No. 2. pp. 192-207.
@article{36e54777ea7b4bf4a61f17c91a18c9cc,
title = "Development and validation of the Diagnostic Interview Adjustment Disorder (DIAD)",
abstract = "Adjustment disorders (ADs) are under-researched due to the absence of a reliable and valid diagnostic tool. This paper describes the development and content/construct validation of a fully structured interview for the diagnosis of AD, the Diagnostic Interview Adjustment Disorder (DIAD). We developed the DIAD by partly adjusting and operationalizing DSM-IV criteria. Eleven experts were consulted on the content of the DIAD. In addition, the DIAD was administered by trained lay interviewers to a representative sample of disability claimants (n=323). To assess construct validity of the DIAD, we explored the associations between the AD classification by the DIAD and summary scores of the Kessler Psychological Distress 10-item Scale (K10) and the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS) by linear regression. Expert agreement on content of the DIAD was moderate to good. The prevalence of AD using the DIAD with revised criteria for the diagnosis AD was 7.4{\%}. The associations of AD by the DIAD with average sum scores on the K10 and the WHODAS supported construct validity of the DIAD. The results provide a first indication that the DIAD is a valid instrument to diagnose AD. Further studies on reliability and on other aspects of validity are needed. {\circledC} 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.",
author = "L.R. Cornelius and S. Brouwer and {de Boer}, M.R. and J.W. Groothoff and {van der Klink}, J.J.L.",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1002/mpr.1418",
language = "English",
volume = "23",
pages = "192--207",
journal = "International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research",
issn = "1049-8931",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",
number = "2",

}

Development and validation of the Diagnostic Interview Adjustment Disorder (DIAD). / Cornelius, L.R.; Brouwer, S.; de Boer, M.R.; Groothoff, J.W.; van der Klink, J.J.L.

In: International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, Vol. 23, No. 2, 2014, p. 192-207.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Development and validation of the Diagnostic Interview Adjustment Disorder (DIAD)

AU - Cornelius, L.R.

AU - Brouwer, S.

AU - de Boer, M.R.

AU - Groothoff, J.W.

AU - van der Klink, J.J.L.

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Adjustment disorders (ADs) are under-researched due to the absence of a reliable and valid diagnostic tool. This paper describes the development and content/construct validation of a fully structured interview for the diagnosis of AD, the Diagnostic Interview Adjustment Disorder (DIAD). We developed the DIAD by partly adjusting and operationalizing DSM-IV criteria. Eleven experts were consulted on the content of the DIAD. In addition, the DIAD was administered by trained lay interviewers to a representative sample of disability claimants (n=323). To assess construct validity of the DIAD, we explored the associations between the AD classification by the DIAD and summary scores of the Kessler Psychological Distress 10-item Scale (K10) and the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS) by linear regression. Expert agreement on content of the DIAD was moderate to good. The prevalence of AD using the DIAD with revised criteria for the diagnosis AD was 7.4%. The associations of AD by the DIAD with average sum scores on the K10 and the WHODAS supported construct validity of the DIAD. The results provide a first indication that the DIAD is a valid instrument to diagnose AD. Further studies on reliability and on other aspects of validity are needed. © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

AB - Adjustment disorders (ADs) are under-researched due to the absence of a reliable and valid diagnostic tool. This paper describes the development and content/construct validation of a fully structured interview for the diagnosis of AD, the Diagnostic Interview Adjustment Disorder (DIAD). We developed the DIAD by partly adjusting and operationalizing DSM-IV criteria. Eleven experts were consulted on the content of the DIAD. In addition, the DIAD was administered by trained lay interviewers to a representative sample of disability claimants (n=323). To assess construct validity of the DIAD, we explored the associations between the AD classification by the DIAD and summary scores of the Kessler Psychological Distress 10-item Scale (K10) and the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS) by linear regression. Expert agreement on content of the DIAD was moderate to good. The prevalence of AD using the DIAD with revised criteria for the diagnosis AD was 7.4%. The associations of AD by the DIAD with average sum scores on the K10 and the WHODAS supported construct validity of the DIAD. The results provide a first indication that the DIAD is a valid instrument to diagnose AD. Further studies on reliability and on other aspects of validity are needed. © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

U2 - 10.1002/mpr.1418

DO - 10.1002/mpr.1418

M3 - Article

VL - 23

SP - 192

EP - 207

JO - International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research

JF - International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research

SN - 1049-8931

IS - 2

ER -