Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews

Beverley J. Shea*, Jeremy M. Grimshaw, George A. Wells, Maarten Boers, Neil Andersson, Candyce Hamel, Ashley C. Porter, Peter Tugwell, David Moher, Lex M. Bouter

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

    143 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Background. Our objective was to develop an instrument to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews, building upon previous tools, empirical evidence and expert consensus. Methods. A 37-item assessment tool was formed by combining 1) the enhanced Overview Quality Assessment Questionnaire (OQAQ), 2) a checklist created by Sacks, and 3) three additional items recently judged to be of methodological importance. This tool was applied to 99 paper-based and 52 electronic systematic reviews. Exploratory factor analysis was used to identify underlying components. The results were considered by methodological experts using a nominal group technique aimed at item reduction and design of an assessment tool with face and content validity. Results. The factor analysis identified 11 components. From each component, one item was selected by the nominal group. The resulting instrument was judged to have face and content validity. Conclusion. A measurement tool for the 'assessment of multiple systematic reviews' (AMSTAR) was developed. The tool consists of 11 items and has good face and content validity for measuring the methodological quality of systematic reviews. Additional studies are needed with a focus on the reproducibility and construct validity of AMSTAR, before strong recommendations can be made on its use.

    Original languageEnglish
    Article number10
    Pages (from-to)1-7
    Number of pages7
    JournalBMC Medical Research Methodology
    Volume7
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 15 Feb 2007

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this