TY - JOUR
T1 - Development of practical tools to realize the epistemic responsibilities of universities
T2 - a co-design study
AU - Lechner, Iris
AU - Ajdari, Emma
AU - van Woudenberg, René
AU - de Ridder, Jeroen
AU - Bouter, Lex
AU - Tijdink, Joeri
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - University rankings have strongly influenced the values, practices, and policies universities adopt to be considered good universities. Thinking in terms of epistemic responsibilities (ERs) of universities provides a novel framework that could counter the traditional use of rankings and its negative effects, by accentuating other and broader responsibilities for research, teaching, and in service to society. We conducted a co-design study to develop practical tools to foster ERs. Applied co-design methodology is characterized by creativity, collaboration, and democratic knowledge formation. In an iterative co-design process with 25 participants from a range of backgrounds, we co-designed three policy tools for fostering ERs at universities: (1) organization of events and activities about the ERs to create awareness about them, (2) establishment of red teams to critically reflect on ERs and (3) setting up co-creation spaces in which stakeholders prioritize and develop university actions to foster ERs. In this study, we showed how policy for higher education can be developed using co-design methodology. Lastly, these three co-designed tools focus on realizing ERs through collaborative bottom-up processes, while also valuing the particular contexts of universities.
AB - University rankings have strongly influenced the values, practices, and policies universities adopt to be considered good universities. Thinking in terms of epistemic responsibilities (ERs) of universities provides a novel framework that could counter the traditional use of rankings and its negative effects, by accentuating other and broader responsibilities for research, teaching, and in service to society. We conducted a co-design study to develop practical tools to foster ERs. Applied co-design methodology is characterized by creativity, collaboration, and democratic knowledge formation. In an iterative co-design process with 25 participants from a range of backgrounds, we co-designed three policy tools for fostering ERs at universities: (1) organization of events and activities about the ERs to create awareness about them, (2) establishment of red teams to critically reflect on ERs and (3) setting up co-creation spaces in which stakeholders prioritize and develop university actions to foster ERs. In this study, we showed how policy for higher education can be developed using co-design methodology. Lastly, these three co-designed tools focus on realizing ERs through collaborative bottom-up processes, while also valuing the particular contexts of universities.
KW - co-design
KW - epistemology
KW - policy
KW - responsibilities
KW - University rankings
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85210174951&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85210174951&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/23322969.2024.2431744
DO - 10.1080/23322969.2024.2431744
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85210174951
SN - 2332-2969
JO - Policy Reviews in Higher Education
JF - Policy Reviews in Higher Education
ER -