Development of upper respiratory tract microbiota in infancy is affected by mode of delivery

A.A.T.M. Bosch, E. Levin, M.A. van Houten, R. Hasrat, G. Kalkman, G. Biesbroek, W.A.A. de Steenhuijsen Piters, P.-K.C.M. de Groot, P. Pernet, B.J.F. Keijser, E.A.M. Sanders, D. Bogaert

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Birth by Caesarian section is associated with short- and long-term respiratory morbidity. We hypothesized that mode of delivery affects the development of the respiratory microbiota, thereby altering its capacity to provide colonization resistance and consecutive pathobiont overgrowth and infections. Therefore, we longitudinally studied the impact of mode of delivery on the nasopharyngeal microbiota development from birth until six months of age in a healthy, unselected birth cohort of 102 children (n = 761 samples). Here, we show that the respiratory microbiota develops within one day from a variable mixed bacterial community towards a Streptococcus viridans-predominated profile, regardless of mode of delivery. Within the first week, rapid niche differentiation had occurred; initially with in most infants Staphylococcus aureus predominance, followed by differentiation towards Corynebacterium pseudodiphteriticum/propinquum, Dolosigranulum pigrum, Moraxella catarrhalis/nonliquefaciens, Streptococcus pneumoniae, and/or Haemophilus influenzae dominated communities. Infants born by Caesarian section showed a delay in overall development of respiratory microbiota profiles with specifically reduced colonization with health-associated commensals like Corynebacterium and Dolosigranulum, thereby possibly influencing respiratory health later in life.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)336-345
JournalEbiomedicine
Volume9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Bibliographical note

With supplementary data

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Development of upper respiratory tract microbiota in infancy is affected by mode of delivery'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this