Did mosasaurs have forked tongues?

Anne S. Schulp, E. W. A. Mulder, K. Schwenk

    Research output: Contribution to JournalReview articleAcademicpeer-review

    Abstract

    Ever since the first mosasaur restorations were published, these extinct marine reptiles have been pictured with either notched, forked or undivided tongues. Here, we present an overview of existing iconography, a review of the previous literature, and we discuss how best to reconstruct tongue form in mosasaurs. Despite disagreement about their precise phylogenetic position, most authors consider mosasaurs members of the Varanoidea, derived anguimorphans including Helodermatidae, Varanidae, Lanthanotus and probably snakes. All anguimorphans share a diploglossan (two-part) tongue, in which the foretongue is derived and modified into a highly protrusible chemosensor, while the hindtongue is plesiomorphic, retaining well-developed papillae, mucocytes and robust posterior lobes. We suggest that mosasaurs had a diploglossan tongue that remained in a relatively underived state. The form of the tongue would probably have been most like modern Heloderma or Lanthanotus with a protrusible chemosensory foretongue and a plesiomorphic, papillose hindtongue. Such a tongue is consistent with well-developed vomeronasal chemoreception through tongue-flicking, with the retention of the ancestral function of hyolingual food transport and swallowing following jaw-prehension of prey. The presence of paired fenestrae in the palate associated with the vomers, as well as the presence of pterygoid teeth are in accordance with such a tongue form in mosasaurs.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)359-371
    Number of pages13
    JournalNetherlands Journal of Geosciences - Geologie en Mijnbouw
    Volume84
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Sep 2005

    Fingerprint

    chemoreception
    iconography
    snake
    reptile
    tooth
    phylogenetics
    food transport
    restoration

    Keywords

    • Feeding
    • Mosasaurs
    • Olfaction
    • Restoration
    • Tongue
    • Vomeronasal organ

    Cite this

    Schulp, Anne S. ; Mulder, E. W. A. ; Schwenk, K. / Did mosasaurs have forked tongues?. In: Netherlands Journal of Geosciences - Geologie en Mijnbouw. 2005 ; Vol. 84, No. 3. pp. 359-371.
    @article{86e59725fd08463e8808721a11b11070,
    title = "Did mosasaurs have forked tongues?",
    abstract = "Ever since the first mosasaur restorations were published, these extinct marine reptiles have been pictured with either notched, forked or undivided tongues. Here, we present an overview of existing iconography, a review of the previous literature, and we discuss how best to reconstruct tongue form in mosasaurs. Despite disagreement about their precise phylogenetic position, most authors consider mosasaurs members of the Varanoidea, derived anguimorphans including Helodermatidae, Varanidae, Lanthanotus and probably snakes. All anguimorphans share a diploglossan (two-part) tongue, in which the foretongue is derived and modified into a highly protrusible chemosensor, while the hindtongue is plesiomorphic, retaining well-developed papillae, mucocytes and robust posterior lobes. We suggest that mosasaurs had a diploglossan tongue that remained in a relatively underived state. The form of the tongue would probably have been most like modern Heloderma or Lanthanotus with a protrusible chemosensory foretongue and a plesiomorphic, papillose hindtongue. Such a tongue is consistent with well-developed vomeronasal chemoreception through tongue-flicking, with the retention of the ancestral function of hyolingual food transport and swallowing following jaw-prehension of prey. The presence of paired fenestrae in the palate associated with the vomers, as well as the presence of pterygoid teeth are in accordance with such a tongue form in mosasaurs.",
    keywords = "Feeding, Mosasaurs, Olfaction, Restoration, Tongue, Vomeronasal organ",
    author = "Schulp, {Anne S.} and Mulder, {E. W. A.} and K. Schwenk",
    year = "2005",
    month = "9",
    doi = "10.1017/S0016774600021144",
    language = "English",
    volume = "84",
    pages = "359--371",
    journal = "Netherlands Journal of Geosciences - Geologie en Mijnbouw",
    issn = "0016-7746",
    publisher = "Cambridge University Press 2010",
    number = "3",

    }

    Did mosasaurs have forked tongues? / Schulp, Anne S.; Mulder, E. W. A.; Schwenk, K.

    In: Netherlands Journal of Geosciences - Geologie en Mijnbouw, Vol. 84, No. 3, 09.2005, p. 359-371.

    Research output: Contribution to JournalReview articleAcademicpeer-review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Did mosasaurs have forked tongues?

    AU - Schulp, Anne S.

    AU - Mulder, E. W. A.

    AU - Schwenk, K.

    PY - 2005/9

    Y1 - 2005/9

    N2 - Ever since the first mosasaur restorations were published, these extinct marine reptiles have been pictured with either notched, forked or undivided tongues. Here, we present an overview of existing iconography, a review of the previous literature, and we discuss how best to reconstruct tongue form in mosasaurs. Despite disagreement about their precise phylogenetic position, most authors consider mosasaurs members of the Varanoidea, derived anguimorphans including Helodermatidae, Varanidae, Lanthanotus and probably snakes. All anguimorphans share a diploglossan (two-part) tongue, in which the foretongue is derived and modified into a highly protrusible chemosensor, while the hindtongue is plesiomorphic, retaining well-developed papillae, mucocytes and robust posterior lobes. We suggest that mosasaurs had a diploglossan tongue that remained in a relatively underived state. The form of the tongue would probably have been most like modern Heloderma or Lanthanotus with a protrusible chemosensory foretongue and a plesiomorphic, papillose hindtongue. Such a tongue is consistent with well-developed vomeronasal chemoreception through tongue-flicking, with the retention of the ancestral function of hyolingual food transport and swallowing following jaw-prehension of prey. The presence of paired fenestrae in the palate associated with the vomers, as well as the presence of pterygoid teeth are in accordance with such a tongue form in mosasaurs.

    AB - Ever since the first mosasaur restorations were published, these extinct marine reptiles have been pictured with either notched, forked or undivided tongues. Here, we present an overview of existing iconography, a review of the previous literature, and we discuss how best to reconstruct tongue form in mosasaurs. Despite disagreement about their precise phylogenetic position, most authors consider mosasaurs members of the Varanoidea, derived anguimorphans including Helodermatidae, Varanidae, Lanthanotus and probably snakes. All anguimorphans share a diploglossan (two-part) tongue, in which the foretongue is derived and modified into a highly protrusible chemosensor, while the hindtongue is plesiomorphic, retaining well-developed papillae, mucocytes and robust posterior lobes. We suggest that mosasaurs had a diploglossan tongue that remained in a relatively underived state. The form of the tongue would probably have been most like modern Heloderma or Lanthanotus with a protrusible chemosensory foretongue and a plesiomorphic, papillose hindtongue. Such a tongue is consistent with well-developed vomeronasal chemoreception through tongue-flicking, with the retention of the ancestral function of hyolingual food transport and swallowing following jaw-prehension of prey. The presence of paired fenestrae in the palate associated with the vomers, as well as the presence of pterygoid teeth are in accordance with such a tongue form in mosasaurs.

    KW - Feeding

    KW - Mosasaurs

    KW - Olfaction

    KW - Restoration

    KW - Tongue

    KW - Vomeronasal organ

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=27644518416&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=27644518416&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1017/S0016774600021144

    DO - 10.1017/S0016774600021144

    M3 - Review article

    VL - 84

    SP - 359

    EP - 371

    JO - Netherlands Journal of Geosciences - Geologie en Mijnbouw

    JF - Netherlands Journal of Geosciences - Geologie en Mijnbouw

    SN - 0016-7746

    IS - 3

    ER -