Abstract
The relationship between Hegel’s conception of Sittlichkeit and Kant’s
moral philosophy is much-discussed, highly controversial and accompanied by many
misunderstandings. Relating it to Kant’s philosophy, this article shows that and how
Hegel’s elaborations on Sittlichkeit can be understood as an attempt to comprehend
the actuality of freedom in the human world. By contrast, the formalism of a Kantian
approach of moral philosophy hinders it willy-nilly to comprehend the actuality, hence,
the ‘fact’ of freedom properly. Hegel’s Sittlichkeit is a conception of the facticity
of freedom. Kant’s conception of Sittlichkeit presupposes such a conception.
moral philosophy is much-discussed, highly controversial and accompanied by many
misunderstandings. Relating it to Kant’s philosophy, this article shows that and how
Hegel’s elaborations on Sittlichkeit can be understood as an attempt to comprehend
the actuality of freedom in the human world. By contrast, the formalism of a Kantian
approach of moral philosophy hinders it willy-nilly to comprehend the actuality, hence,
the ‘fact’ of freedom properly. Hegel’s Sittlichkeit is a conception of the facticity
of freedom. Kant’s conception of Sittlichkeit presupposes such a conception.
| Original language | German |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 37-144 |
| Number of pages | 108 |
| Journal | Folia Philosophica |
| Volume | 39 |
| Publication status | Published - 2018 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver