TY - JOUR
T1 - Differences between autistic and non-autistic individuals in audiovisual speech integration
T2 - A systematic review and meta-analysis
AU - Jertberg, Robert M
AU - Wienicke, Frederik J
AU - Andruszkiewicz, Krystian
AU - Begeer, Sander
AU - Chakrabarti, Bhismadev
AU - Geurts, Hilde M
AU - de Vries, Ralph
AU - Van der Burg, Erik
N1 - Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
PY - 2024/9
Y1 - 2024/9
N2 - Research has indicated unique challenges in audiovisual integration of speech among autistic individuals, although methodological differences have led to divergent findings. We conducted a systematic literature search to identify studies that measured audiovisual speech integration among both autistic and non-autistic individuals. Across the 18 identified studies (combined N = 952), autistic individuals showed impaired audiovisual integration compared to their non-autistic peers (g = 0.69, 95 % CI [0.53, 0.85], p <.001). This difference was not found to be influenced by participants' mean ages, studies' sample sizes, risk-of-bias scores, or paradigms employed. However, a subgroup analysis suggested that child studies may show larger between-group differences than adult ones. The prevailing pattern of impaired audiovisual speech integration in autism may have cascading effects on communicative and social behavior. However, small samples and inconsistency in designs/analyses translated into considerable heterogeneity in findings and opacity regarding the influence of underlying unisensory and attentional factors. We recommend three key directions for future research: larger samples, more research with adults, and standardization of methodology and analytical approaches.
AB - Research has indicated unique challenges in audiovisual integration of speech among autistic individuals, although methodological differences have led to divergent findings. We conducted a systematic literature search to identify studies that measured audiovisual speech integration among both autistic and non-autistic individuals. Across the 18 identified studies (combined N = 952), autistic individuals showed impaired audiovisual integration compared to their non-autistic peers (g = 0.69, 95 % CI [0.53, 0.85], p <.001). This difference was not found to be influenced by participants' mean ages, studies' sample sizes, risk-of-bias scores, or paradigms employed. However, a subgroup analysis suggested that child studies may show larger between-group differences than adult ones. The prevailing pattern of impaired audiovisual speech integration in autism may have cascading effects on communicative and social behavior. However, small samples and inconsistency in designs/analyses translated into considerable heterogeneity in findings and opacity regarding the influence of underlying unisensory and attentional factors. We recommend three key directions for future research: larger samples, more research with adults, and standardization of methodology and analytical approaches.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85199291317&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85199291317&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85199291317
UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85199291317&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2024.105787
DO - 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2024.105787
M3 - Review article
C2 - 38945419
SN - 0149-7634
VL - 164
SP - 1
EP - 9
JO - Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews
JF - Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews
M1 - 105787
ER -