TY - JOUR
T1 - Differential item functioning of the Functional Independence Measure in higher performing neurological patients
AU - Dallmeijer, A.J.
AU - Dekker, J.
AU - Roorda, L.D.
AU - Knol, D.L.
AU - van Baalen, B.
AU - de Groot, V.
AU - Schepers, V.P.
AU - Lankhorst, G.J.
PY - 2005
Y1 - 2005
N2 - Objective: When comparing outcomes of the Functional Independence Measure (FIM™) between patient groups, item characteristics of the FIM™ should be consistent across groups. The purpose of this study was to compare item difficulty of the FIM™ in 3 patient groups with neurological disorders. Subjects: Patients with stroke (n = 295), multiple sclerosis (n = 150), and traumatic brain injury (n = 88). Methods: FIM™ scores were administered in each group. The FIM™ consists of a motor domain (13 items) and a cognitive domain (5 items). Rasch rating scale analysis was performed to investigate differences in item difficulty (differential item functioning) between groups. Results: Answering categories of the FIM™ items were reduced to 3 (from the original 7) because of disordered thresholds and low answering frequencies. Two items of the motor domain ("bladder" and "bowel") did not fit the Rasch model. For 7 out of the 11 fitting motor items, item difficulties were different between groups (i.e. showed differential item functioning). All cognitive items fitted the Rasch model, and 4 out of 5 cognitive items showed differential item functioning. Conclusion: Differential item functioning is present in several items of both the motor and cognitive domain of the FIM™. Adjustments for differential item functioning may be required when FIM™ data will be compared between groups or will be used in a pooled data analysis. © 2005 Taylor & Francis.
AB - Objective: When comparing outcomes of the Functional Independence Measure (FIM™) between patient groups, item characteristics of the FIM™ should be consistent across groups. The purpose of this study was to compare item difficulty of the FIM™ in 3 patient groups with neurological disorders. Subjects: Patients with stroke (n = 295), multiple sclerosis (n = 150), and traumatic brain injury (n = 88). Methods: FIM™ scores were administered in each group. The FIM™ consists of a motor domain (13 items) and a cognitive domain (5 items). Rasch rating scale analysis was performed to investigate differences in item difficulty (differential item functioning) between groups. Results: Answering categories of the FIM™ items were reduced to 3 (from the original 7) because of disordered thresholds and low answering frequencies. Two items of the motor domain ("bladder" and "bowel") did not fit the Rasch model. For 7 out of the 11 fitting motor items, item difficulties were different between groups (i.e. showed differential item functioning). All cognitive items fitted the Rasch model, and 4 out of 5 cognitive items showed differential item functioning. Conclusion: Differential item functioning is present in several items of both the motor and cognitive domain of the FIM™. Adjustments for differential item functioning may be required when FIM™ data will be compared between groups or will be used in a pooled data analysis. © 2005 Taylor & Francis.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/29244478301
UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=29244478301&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/16501970510038284
DO - 10.1080/16501970510038284
M3 - Article
SN - 1650-1977
VL - 37
SP - 346
EP - 352
JO - Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine
JF - Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine
IS - 6
ER -