Discounting and the social cost of carbon: A closer look at uncertainty

J.K. Guo, C. Hepburn, R.S.J. Tol, D. Anthoff

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Recently, in the economics literature, several papers have put forward arguments for using a declining discount rate in social-cost benefit analysis. This paper examines the impact of employing a declining discount rate on the social cost of carbon-the marginal social damage from a ton of emitted carbon. Six declining discounting schemes are implemented in the FUND 2.8 integrated assessment model, including the recent amendments to the Green Book of HM Treasury (Treasury, H.M., 2003. The Greenbook: Appraisal and Evaluation in Central Government. TSO, London). We find that using a declining schedule of discount rates increases the social cost of carbon estimate by as little as 10% or by as much as a factor of 40, depending upon the scenario selected. Although the range of plausible estimates is large, using declining discounting schemes in FUND 2.8 in most cases does not yield values at the £70/tC level suggested by UK DEFRA [Clarkson, R., Deyes, K., 2002. Estimating the social cost of carbon emissions. Government Economic Service Working Paper. HM Treasury, London]. Indeed, only at the higher end of the values of social cost of carbon found here would many climate change related policies - such as the Kyoto Protocol - pass a cost-benefit analysis. This conclusion, however, does not necessarily undermine the ethical and political economic reasons for supporting international collective action on climate change. © 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)203-216
Number of pages14
JournalEnvironmental Science & Policy
Volume9
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2006

Fingerprint

social costs
uncertainty
discount rate
carbon
cost-benefit analysis
climate change
economics
Kyoto Protocol
collective action
carbon emission
collective behavior
amendment
Values
damages
social cost
scenario
damage
evaluation

Cite this

Guo, J.K. ; Hepburn, C. ; Tol, R.S.J. ; Anthoff, D. / Discounting and the social cost of carbon: A closer look at uncertainty. In: Environmental Science & Policy. 2006 ; Vol. 9, No. 5. pp. 203-216.
@article{63f77c122a1345f3a198c045ecc3255d,
title = "Discounting and the social cost of carbon: A closer look at uncertainty",
abstract = "Recently, in the economics literature, several papers have put forward arguments for using a declining discount rate in social-cost benefit analysis. This paper examines the impact of employing a declining discount rate on the social cost of carbon-the marginal social damage from a ton of emitted carbon. Six declining discounting schemes are implemented in the FUND 2.8 integrated assessment model, including the recent amendments to the Green Book of HM Treasury (Treasury, H.M., 2003. The Greenbook: Appraisal and Evaluation in Central Government. TSO, London). We find that using a declining schedule of discount rates increases the social cost of carbon estimate by as little as 10{\%} or by as much as a factor of 40, depending upon the scenario selected. Although the range of plausible estimates is large, using declining discounting schemes in FUND 2.8 in most cases does not yield values at the £70/tC level suggested by UK DEFRA [Clarkson, R., Deyes, K., 2002. Estimating the social cost of carbon emissions. Government Economic Service Working Paper. HM Treasury, London]. Indeed, only at the higher end of the values of social cost of carbon found here would many climate change related policies - such as the Kyoto Protocol - pass a cost-benefit analysis. This conclusion, however, does not necessarily undermine the ethical and political economic reasons for supporting international collective action on climate change. {\circledC} 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.",
author = "J.K. Guo and C. Hepburn and R.S.J. Tol and D. Anthoff",
year = "2006",
doi = "10.1016/j.envsci.2005.11.010",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
pages = "203--216",
journal = "Environmental Science & Policy",
issn = "1462-9011",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "5",

}

Discounting and the social cost of carbon: A closer look at uncertainty. / Guo, J.K.; Hepburn, C.; Tol, R.S.J.; Anthoff, D.

In: Environmental Science & Policy, Vol. 9, No. 5, 2006, p. 203-216.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Discounting and the social cost of carbon: A closer look at uncertainty

AU - Guo, J.K.

AU - Hepburn, C.

AU - Tol, R.S.J.

AU - Anthoff, D.

PY - 2006

Y1 - 2006

N2 - Recently, in the economics literature, several papers have put forward arguments for using a declining discount rate in social-cost benefit analysis. This paper examines the impact of employing a declining discount rate on the social cost of carbon-the marginal social damage from a ton of emitted carbon. Six declining discounting schemes are implemented in the FUND 2.8 integrated assessment model, including the recent amendments to the Green Book of HM Treasury (Treasury, H.M., 2003. The Greenbook: Appraisal and Evaluation in Central Government. TSO, London). We find that using a declining schedule of discount rates increases the social cost of carbon estimate by as little as 10% or by as much as a factor of 40, depending upon the scenario selected. Although the range of plausible estimates is large, using declining discounting schemes in FUND 2.8 in most cases does not yield values at the £70/tC level suggested by UK DEFRA [Clarkson, R., Deyes, K., 2002. Estimating the social cost of carbon emissions. Government Economic Service Working Paper. HM Treasury, London]. Indeed, only at the higher end of the values of social cost of carbon found here would many climate change related policies - such as the Kyoto Protocol - pass a cost-benefit analysis. This conclusion, however, does not necessarily undermine the ethical and political economic reasons for supporting international collective action on climate change. © 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

AB - Recently, in the economics literature, several papers have put forward arguments for using a declining discount rate in social-cost benefit analysis. This paper examines the impact of employing a declining discount rate on the social cost of carbon-the marginal social damage from a ton of emitted carbon. Six declining discounting schemes are implemented in the FUND 2.8 integrated assessment model, including the recent amendments to the Green Book of HM Treasury (Treasury, H.M., 2003. The Greenbook: Appraisal and Evaluation in Central Government. TSO, London). We find that using a declining schedule of discount rates increases the social cost of carbon estimate by as little as 10% or by as much as a factor of 40, depending upon the scenario selected. Although the range of plausible estimates is large, using declining discounting schemes in FUND 2.8 in most cases does not yield values at the £70/tC level suggested by UK DEFRA [Clarkson, R., Deyes, K., 2002. Estimating the social cost of carbon emissions. Government Economic Service Working Paper. HM Treasury, London]. Indeed, only at the higher end of the values of social cost of carbon found here would many climate change related policies - such as the Kyoto Protocol - pass a cost-benefit analysis. This conclusion, however, does not necessarily undermine the ethical and political economic reasons for supporting international collective action on climate change. © 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

U2 - 10.1016/j.envsci.2005.11.010

DO - 10.1016/j.envsci.2005.11.010

M3 - Article

VL - 9

SP - 203

EP - 216

JO - Environmental Science & Policy

JF - Environmental Science & Policy

SN - 1462-9011

IS - 5

ER -