@inproceedings{c0a192633cf24c1c8dd97c705d4195c2,
title = "Discussion games for preferred semantics of abstract dialectical frameworks",
abstract = "{\textcopyright} Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019.Abstract dialectical frameworks (ADFs) are introduced as a general formalism for modeling and evaluating argumentation. However, the role of discussion in reasoning in ADFs has not been clarified well so far. The current work provides a discussion game as a proof method for preferred semantics of ADFs to cover this gap. We show that an argument is credulously acceptable (deniable) by an ADF under preferred semantics iff there exists a discussion game that can defend the acceptance (denial) of the argument in question.",
author = "{Keshavarzi Zafarghandi}, A. and R. Verbrugge and B. Verheij",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.1007/978-3-030-29765-7_6",
language = "English",
isbn = "9783030297640",
series = "Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
pages = "62--73",
editor = "G. Kern-Isberner and Z. Ognjanovi{\'c}",
booktitle = "Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty - 15th European Conference, ECSQARU 2019, Proceedings",
note = "15th European Conference on Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty, ECSQARU 2019 ; Conference date: 18-09-2019 Through 20-09-2019",
}