Disentangling the effects of plant species invasion and urban development on arthropod community composition

Wendy A M Jesse, Jasper Molleman, Oscar Franken, Mark Lammers, Matty P Berg, Jocelyn E Behm, Matthew R Helmus, Jacintha Ellers

    Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

    124 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Urban development and species invasion are two major global threats to biodiversity. These threats often co-occur, as developed areas are more prone to species invasion. However, few empirical studies have tested if both factors affect biodiversity in similar ways. Here we study the individual and combined effects of urban development and plant invasion on the composition of arthropod communities. We assessed 36 paired invaded and non-invaded sample plots, invaded by the plant Antigonon leptopus, with half of these pairs located in natural and the other half in developed land-use types on the Caribbean island of St. Eustatius. We used several taxonomic and functional variables to describe community composition and diversity. Our results show that both urban development and A. leptopus invasion affected community composition, albeit in different ways. Development significantly increased species richness and exponential Shannon diversity, while invasion had no effect on these variables. However, invasion significantly increased arthropod abundance and caused biotic homogenization. Specifically, uninvaded arthropod communities were distinctly different in species composition between developed and natural sites, while they became undistinguishable after A. leptopus invasion. Moreover, functional variables were significantly affected by species invasion, but not by urban development. Invaded communities had higher community-weighted mean body size and the feeding guild composition of invaded arthropod communities was characterized by the exceptional numbers of nectarivores, herbivores, and detritivores. With the exception of species richness and exponential Shannon diversity, invasion influenced four out of six response variables to a greater degree than urban development did. Hence, we can conclude that species invasion is not just a passenger of urban development but also a driver of change.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)3294-3306
    Number of pages13
    JournalGlobal Change Biology
    Volume26
    Issue number6
    Early online date26 Mar 2020
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Jun 2020

    Bibliographical note

    © 2020 The Authors. Global Change Biology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

    Funding

    We are grateful for the Academy Ecology Fund (grant number: UPS/375/Eco/J1515) and the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (grant number: 858.14.041) for their financial support. Many thanks to St. Eustatius National Parks Foundation (STENAPA), Ecological Professionals Foundation, and the Caribbean Netherlands Science Institute (CNSI) for supplying us with advice, permits, accommodations, and laboratory facilities in the field. We also thank Shelley Works for providing us with detailed weather data for our analyses, and Elizabeth Haber for her expertise on A. leptopus and providing the distribution map from Berkowitz, 2014. Lastly, we thank prof. P. Borges and two anonymous reviewers for their valuable insight and suggestions, which have greatly improved this manuscript. No potential conflict of interest was reported by any of the authors of this study. We are grateful for the Academy Ecology Fund (grant number: UPS/375/Eco/J1515) and the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (grant number: 858.14.041) for their financial support. Many thanks to St. Eustatius National Parks Foundation (STENAPA), Ecological Professionals Foundation, and the Caribbean Netherlands Science Institute (CNSI) for supplying us with advice, permits, accommodations, and laboratory facilities in the field. We also thank Shelley Works for providing us with detailed weather data for our analyses, and Elizabeth Haber for her expertise on and providing the distribution map from Berkowitz, 2014. Lastly, we thank prof. P. Borges and two anonymous reviewers for their valuable insight and suggestions, which have greatly improved this manuscript. No potential conflict of interest was reported by any of the authors of this study. A. leptopus

    FundersFunder number
    Academy Ecology FundUPS/375/Eco/J1515
    Caribbean Netherlands Science Institute
    Ecological Professionals Foundation
    Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research
    STENAPA
    St. Eustatius National Parks Foundation
    Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek858.14.041

      Fingerprint

      Dive into the research topics of 'Disentangling the effects of plant species invasion and urban development on arthropod community composition'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

      Cite this