Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Disputing taste: Food pleasure as an achievement in interaction

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

35 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

While identity has been a dominant topic in research on food choice, literature on identity in consumers' everyday life is scarce. In this article we draw on insights from discursive psychology to demonstrate how members of an online forum on food pleasure handle the hedonic appreciation of food in everyday interaction. We examined 40 discussions consisting of 1715 e-mails related to culinary topics. The analysis focuses on the way in which the participants of this forum work up and establish their identities as 'gourmets'. A dominant tool in performing this identity work is the discursive construction of independent access to knowledge of and experience with food items, so as to compete with or resist the epistemic superiority of a preceding evaluation. Data are presented with nine examples of the 73 manifestations of the construction of independent access. Contrary to sensory approaches to food choice, this study depicts the enjoyment of food as an interactional achievement rather than a pure physiological sensation. Wider implications of this study for the relation between food, identity and taste are discussed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)107-116
Number of pages10
JournalAppetite
Volume46
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2006
Externally publishedYes

Funding

The authors would like to acknowledge the financial support for this project provided by the Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development. Furthermore, they would like to thank Cees van Woerkum for his comments on an earlier draft of this paper. Appendix A

Keywords

  • Discourse
  • Discursive psychology
  • Food choice
  • Hedonism
  • Identity
  • Taste

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Disputing taste: Food pleasure as an achievement in interaction'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this