TY - JOUR
T1 - Disruptions in foster care: A review and meta-analysis
AU - Oosterman, M.
AU - Schuengel, C.
AU - Slot, N.W.
AU - Bullens, R.A.R.
AU - Doreleijers, T.A.H.
PY - 2007
Y1 - 2007
N2 - This review examined risk and protective factors associated with placement breakdown across k = 26 studies of 20,650 children in foster families. A series of meta-analyses were performed to assess the average effect sizes across multiple studies on the same factors. Older age at placement (k = 15), behavior problems (k = 13), a history of residential care (k = 7) and previous placements (k = 6) showed significant small to moderate associations with placement breakdown. A large combined effect size was found for behavior problems when analyzed in multivariate models. Unexpectedly, kinship care (k = 6) did not show a significant association with placement breakdown. Other potential protective factors of placement breakdown referred to the quality of foster caregiving and other foster care related aspects, which showed small to large effect sizes. However, findings were contradictory when univariate and multivariate results were compared. Results of multivariate studies suggested mediating and moderating effects of variables related to the children's background. This might suggest that more insight in the processes leading up to placement breakdown may be derived from causal models. © 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
AB - This review examined risk and protective factors associated with placement breakdown across k = 26 studies of 20,650 children in foster families. A series of meta-analyses were performed to assess the average effect sizes across multiple studies on the same factors. Older age at placement (k = 15), behavior problems (k = 13), a history of residential care (k = 7) and previous placements (k = 6) showed significant small to moderate associations with placement breakdown. A large combined effect size was found for behavior problems when analyzed in multivariate models. Unexpectedly, kinship care (k = 6) did not show a significant association with placement breakdown. Other potential protective factors of placement breakdown referred to the quality of foster caregiving and other foster care related aspects, which showed small to large effect sizes. However, findings were contradictory when univariate and multivariate results were compared. Results of multivariate studies suggested mediating and moderating effects of variables related to the children's background. This might suggest that more insight in the processes leading up to placement breakdown may be derived from causal models. © 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
U2 - 10.1016/j.childyouth.2006.07.003
DO - 10.1016/j.childyouth.2006.07.003
M3 - Article
SN - 0190-7409
VL - 29
SP - 53
EP - 76
JO - Children and Youth Services Review
JF - Children and Youth Services Review
IS - 1
ER -