Dissecting the Role of Dominance in Robberies: An Analysis and Implications for Microsociology of Violence

Lasse Suonperä Liebst, Marie Rosenkrantz Lindegaard, Wim Bernasco*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

The influential microsociological theory of violence advanced by Randall Collins suggests that emotional dominance preconditions physical violence. Here, we examine robbery incidents as counterevidence of this proposition. Using 50 video clips of real-life commercial robberies recorded by surveillance cameras, we observed, coded, and analyzed the interpersonal behaviors of offenders and victims in microdetail. We found no support for Collins’s hypothesized link between dominance and violence, but evidence against it instead. It is the absence, not the presence, of emotional offender dominance that promotes offender violence. We consider these results in the light of criminological research on robbery violence and suggest that Collins’s strong situational stance would benefit from a greater appreciation of instrumental motivation and cold-headed premeditation.

Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Interpersonal Violence
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2019

Keywords

  • CCTV
  • emotional dominance
  • microsociology of violence
  • robbery
  • violence

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Dissecting the Role of Dominance in Robberies: An Analysis and Implications for Microsociology of Violence'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this