Do Incentives for Municipalities Reduce the Welfare Caseload? Evaluation of a Welfare Reform in the Netherlands

Lucy Kok, Caren Tempelman, P.W.C. Koning, Lennart Kroon, Caroline Berden

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Since 2004, most municipalities in the Netherlands receive lump sum payments from the state for the payment of social assistance allowances. As municipalities had no authority to change the eligibility rules for social assistance, the effects of the welfare reform are solely due to the efforts of municipalities to decrease the number of welfare recipients. Using variation in the timing of policy changes, this paper uses a difference-in-difference approach to assess the effectiveness of the incentive for municipalities. Based on individual panel data from administrative records, we show that the high-powered scheme led to a decline of the welfare caseload of 14% up till 2008. The reform has been most effective for those with the highest welfare dependency: single mothers and singles from non-western origin. In line with standard economic predictions, the reform does not give an incentive for cream skimming: the welfare caseload declined as well for easy to place recipients as for difficult to place recipients.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)23-42
Number of pages20
JournalEconomist
Volume165
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2017

Fingerprint

Incentives
Welfare reform
Municipalities
The Netherlands
Evaluation
Social assistance
Payment
Cream skimming
Single mothers
Panel data
Prediction
Authority
Policy change
Economics
Difference-in-differences

Keywords

  • Decentralisation
  • Financial incentive
  • Principal agent
  • Welfare caseload

Cite this

Kok, Lucy ; Tempelman, Caren ; Koning, P.W.C. ; Kroon, Lennart ; Berden, Caroline. / Do Incentives for Municipalities Reduce the Welfare Caseload? Evaluation of a Welfare Reform in the Netherlands. In: Economist. 2017 ; Vol. 165, No. 1. pp. 23-42.
@article{9e8c76d4ed2848a8a0d1279b4a040be4,
title = "Do Incentives for Municipalities Reduce the Welfare Caseload? Evaluation of a Welfare Reform in the Netherlands",
abstract = "Since 2004, most municipalities in the Netherlands receive lump sum payments from the state for the payment of social assistance allowances. As municipalities had no authority to change the eligibility rules for social assistance, the effects of the welfare reform are solely due to the efforts of municipalities to decrease the number of welfare recipients. Using variation in the timing of policy changes, this paper uses a difference-in-difference approach to assess the effectiveness of the incentive for municipalities. Based on individual panel data from administrative records, we show that the high-powered scheme led to a decline of the welfare caseload of 14{\%} up till 2008. The reform has been most effective for those with the highest welfare dependency: single mothers and singles from non-western origin. In line with standard economic predictions, the reform does not give an incentive for cream skimming: the welfare caseload declined as well for easy to place recipients as for difficult to place recipients.",
keywords = "Decentralisation, Financial incentive, Principal agent, Welfare caseload",
author = "Lucy Kok and Caren Tempelman and P.W.C. Koning and Lennart Kroon and Caroline Berden",
year = "2017",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s10645-017-9292-9",
language = "English",
volume = "165",
pages = "23--42",
journal = "Economist",
issn = "0013-063X",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "1",

}

Do Incentives for Municipalities Reduce the Welfare Caseload? Evaluation of a Welfare Reform in the Netherlands. / Kok, Lucy; Tempelman, Caren; Koning, P.W.C.; Kroon, Lennart; Berden, Caroline.

In: Economist, Vol. 165, No. 1, 01.03.2017, p. 23-42.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Do Incentives for Municipalities Reduce the Welfare Caseload? Evaluation of a Welfare Reform in the Netherlands

AU - Kok, Lucy

AU - Tempelman, Caren

AU - Koning, P.W.C.

AU - Kroon, Lennart

AU - Berden, Caroline

PY - 2017/3/1

Y1 - 2017/3/1

N2 - Since 2004, most municipalities in the Netherlands receive lump sum payments from the state for the payment of social assistance allowances. As municipalities had no authority to change the eligibility rules for social assistance, the effects of the welfare reform are solely due to the efforts of municipalities to decrease the number of welfare recipients. Using variation in the timing of policy changes, this paper uses a difference-in-difference approach to assess the effectiveness of the incentive for municipalities. Based on individual panel data from administrative records, we show that the high-powered scheme led to a decline of the welfare caseload of 14% up till 2008. The reform has been most effective for those with the highest welfare dependency: single mothers and singles from non-western origin. In line with standard economic predictions, the reform does not give an incentive for cream skimming: the welfare caseload declined as well for easy to place recipients as for difficult to place recipients.

AB - Since 2004, most municipalities in the Netherlands receive lump sum payments from the state for the payment of social assistance allowances. As municipalities had no authority to change the eligibility rules for social assistance, the effects of the welfare reform are solely due to the efforts of municipalities to decrease the number of welfare recipients. Using variation in the timing of policy changes, this paper uses a difference-in-difference approach to assess the effectiveness of the incentive for municipalities. Based on individual panel data from administrative records, we show that the high-powered scheme led to a decline of the welfare caseload of 14% up till 2008. The reform has been most effective for those with the highest welfare dependency: single mothers and singles from non-western origin. In line with standard economic predictions, the reform does not give an incentive for cream skimming: the welfare caseload declined as well for easy to place recipients as for difficult to place recipients.

KW - Decentralisation

KW - Financial incentive

KW - Principal agent

KW - Welfare caseload

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85012170391&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85012170391&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10645-017-9292-9

DO - 10.1007/s10645-017-9292-9

M3 - Article

VL - 165

SP - 23

EP - 42

JO - Economist

JF - Economist

SN - 0013-063X

IS - 1

ER -