Do payments for forest ecosystem services generate double dividends? An integrated impact assessment of Vietnam’s PES program

Thu Ha Dang Phan*, Roy Brouwer, Long Phi Hoang, Marc David Davidson

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Payments for ecosystem services (PES) often serve multiple objectives, such as carbon emission reduction and poverty alleviation. However, the effectiveness of PES as an instrument to achieve these multiple objectives, in particular in a conservation-development context, is often questioned. This study adds to the very limited empirical evidence base and investigates to what extent Vietnam’s move to PES has helped protect forest ecosystems and improve local livelihoods and income inequality. We zoom in on Lam Dong province, where PES was first introduced in Vietnam in 2009. Changes in forest cover are analysed using satellite images over a period of 15 years (2000–2014). Socio-economic impacts are assessed based on rural household interviews with PES participants and non-participants as a control group over a period of 7 years (2008–2014). Our results show that PES contributes significantly to forest cover, the improvement of local livelihoods, and the reduction of income inequality.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere0200881
Pages (from-to)1-16
Number of pages16
JournalPLoS ONE
Volume13
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Aug 2018

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Do payments for forest ecosystem services generate double dividends? An integrated impact assessment of Vietnam’s PES program'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this