Abstract
We compared matches between colours that were both presented on a computer monitor or both as pieces of paper, with matching the colour of a piece of paper with a colour presented on a computer monitor and vice versa. Performance was specifically poor when setting an image on a computer monitor to match the colour of a piece of paper. This cannot be due to any of the individual judgments because subjects readily selected a matching piece of paper to match another piece of paper and set the image on the monitor to match another image on a monitor. We propose that matching the light reaching the eye and matching surface reflectance are fundamentally different judgments and that subjects can sometimes but not always choose which to match. © 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 702-707 |
| Journal | Vision Research |
| Volume | 49 |
| Issue number | 7 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2009 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Do people match surface reflectance fundamentally differently than they match emitted light?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver