Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Do people match surface reflectance fundamentally differently than they match emitted light?

    Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

    Abstract

    We compared matches between colours that were both presented on a computer monitor or both as pieces of paper, with matching the colour of a piece of paper with a colour presented on a computer monitor and vice versa. Performance was specifically poor when setting an image on a computer monitor to match the colour of a piece of paper. This cannot be due to any of the individual judgments because subjects readily selected a matching piece of paper to match another piece of paper and set the image on the monitor to match another image on a monitor. We propose that matching the light reaching the eye and matching surface reflectance are fundamentally different judgments and that subjects can sometimes but not always choose which to match. © 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)702-707
    JournalVision Research
    Volume49
    Issue number7
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2009

    UN SDGs

    This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

    1. SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
      SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Do people match surface reflectance fundamentally differently than they match emitted light?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this