Do the Humanities Need a Relication Drive? A Debate Rages on: Retraction Watch, 13 February 2019

R. Peels; L.M. Bouter; René van Woudenberg

Do the Humanities Need a Relication Drive? A Debate Rages on: Retraction Watch, 13 February 2019

R. Peels, L.M. Bouter, René van Woudenberg

Research output: Online publication or Non-textual form › Online publication or Website › Academic

Abstract

we defend the idea that replication studies in the humanities aren't impossible, and that some sorts of studies are rather good candidates for such a study.

Original language	English
Media of output	Online
Publication status	Published - 2019

Keywords

replication
humanities

Access to Document

https://retractionwatch.com/2019/02/13/do-the-humanities-need-a-replication-drive-a-debate-rages-on/#more-86398

Cite this

@misc{aa42a1096b914a9d8a52829a931791fa,

title = "Do the Humanities Need a Relication Drive? A Debate Rages on: Retraction Watch, 13 February 2019",

abstract = "we defend the idea that replication studies in the humanities aren't impossible, and that some sorts of studies are rather good candidates for such a study.",

keywords = "replication, humanities",

author = "R. Peels and L.M. Bouter and {van Woudenberg}, Ren{\'e}",

year = "2019",

language = "English",

}

TY - ADVS

T1 - Do the Humanities Need a Relication Drive? A Debate Rages on

T2 - Retraction Watch, 13 February 2019

AU - Peels, R.

AU - Bouter, L.M.

AU - van Woudenberg, René

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - we defend the idea that replication studies in the humanities aren't impossible, and that some sorts of studies are rather good candidates for such a study.

AB - we defend the idea that replication studies in the humanities aren't impossible, and that some sorts of studies are rather good candidates for such a study.

KW - replication

KW - humanities

M3 - Online publication or Website

ER -

Do the Humanities Need a Relication Drive? A Debate Rages on: Retraction Watch, 13 February 2019

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this