Does European Union Policy Making Explain Accounting Choices? An Empirical Analysis of the Effects of Investigations by the DG Competition on Accounting Choices

R. Koenigsgruber, D. Windisch

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

The hypothesis that political costs caused by the regulatory process impact upon accounting has been tested extensively and has found considerable empirical support. However, most studies use data from the United States. Whether the conclusions carry over to different institutional settings is an open question. This study exploits the fact that, in the European Union, there exists a policy area-competition policy-in which the European Commission can act in a manner significantly less constrained than in most other policy areas, imposing substantial fines on companies found to be in infringement of European competition regulations. Companies investigated by the Commission's Directorate General for Competition have strong incentives to deflect attention and keep a low profile. It is conjectured that such companies will use income-decreasing accruals in order not to appear to be making unjustified profits. The results confirm this conjecture. © 2012 Springer Science+Business Media New York.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)717-731
JournalJournal of Management & Governance
Volume18
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Policy making
Accounting choice
Empirical analysis
European Union
Incentives
Income
Infringement
Profit
Competition policy
Political costs
Accruals
European Commission

Cite this

@article{7b101664de084b9aa6b3dce1bc049145,
title = "Does European Union Policy Making Explain Accounting Choices? An Empirical Analysis of the Effects of Investigations by the DG Competition on Accounting Choices",
abstract = "The hypothesis that political costs caused by the regulatory process impact upon accounting has been tested extensively and has found considerable empirical support. However, most studies use data from the United States. Whether the conclusions carry over to different institutional settings is an open question. This study exploits the fact that, in the European Union, there exists a policy area-competition policy-in which the European Commission can act in a manner significantly less constrained than in most other policy areas, imposing substantial fines on companies found to be in infringement of European competition regulations. Companies investigated by the Commission's Directorate General for Competition have strong incentives to deflect attention and keep a low profile. It is conjectured that such companies will use income-decreasing accruals in order not to appear to be making unjustified profits. The results confirm this conjecture. {\circledC} 2012 Springer Science+Business Media New York.",
author = "R. Koenigsgruber and D. Windisch",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1007/s10997-012-9242-5",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
pages = "717--731",
journal = "Journal of Management & Governance",
issn = "1385-3457",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "3",

}

Does European Union Policy Making Explain Accounting Choices? An Empirical Analysis of the Effects of Investigations by the DG Competition on Accounting Choices. / Koenigsgruber, R.; Windisch, D.

In: Journal of Management & Governance, Vol. 18, No. 3, 2014, p. 717-731.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Does European Union Policy Making Explain Accounting Choices? An Empirical Analysis of the Effects of Investigations by the DG Competition on Accounting Choices

AU - Koenigsgruber, R.

AU - Windisch, D.

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - The hypothesis that political costs caused by the regulatory process impact upon accounting has been tested extensively and has found considerable empirical support. However, most studies use data from the United States. Whether the conclusions carry over to different institutional settings is an open question. This study exploits the fact that, in the European Union, there exists a policy area-competition policy-in which the European Commission can act in a manner significantly less constrained than in most other policy areas, imposing substantial fines on companies found to be in infringement of European competition regulations. Companies investigated by the Commission's Directorate General for Competition have strong incentives to deflect attention and keep a low profile. It is conjectured that such companies will use income-decreasing accruals in order not to appear to be making unjustified profits. The results confirm this conjecture. © 2012 Springer Science+Business Media New York.

AB - The hypothesis that political costs caused by the regulatory process impact upon accounting has been tested extensively and has found considerable empirical support. However, most studies use data from the United States. Whether the conclusions carry over to different institutional settings is an open question. This study exploits the fact that, in the European Union, there exists a policy area-competition policy-in which the European Commission can act in a manner significantly less constrained than in most other policy areas, imposing substantial fines on companies found to be in infringement of European competition regulations. Companies investigated by the Commission's Directorate General for Competition have strong incentives to deflect attention and keep a low profile. It is conjectured that such companies will use income-decreasing accruals in order not to appear to be making unjustified profits. The results confirm this conjecture. © 2012 Springer Science+Business Media New York.

U2 - 10.1007/s10997-012-9242-5

DO - 10.1007/s10997-012-9242-5

M3 - Article

VL - 18

SP - 717

EP - 731

JO - Journal of Management & Governance

JF - Journal of Management & Governance

SN - 1385-3457

IS - 3

ER -