Does nature have joints worth carving? A discussion of taxometrics, model-based clustering and latent variable mixture modeling

G.H. Lubke, P.J. Miller

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Taxometric procedures, model-based clustering and latent variable mixture modeling (LVMM) are statistical methods that use the inter-relationships of observed symptoms or questionnaire items to investigate empirically whether the underlying psychiatric or psychological construct is dimensional or categorical. In this review we show why the results of such an investigation depend on the characteristics of the observed symptoms (e.g. symptom prevalence in the sample) and of the sample (e.g. clinical, population sample). Furthermore, the three methods differ with respect to their assumptions and therefore require different types of a priori knowledge about the observed symptoms and their inter-relationships. We argue that the choice of method should optimally match and make use of the existing knowledge about the data that are analyzed.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)705-715
JournalPsychological Medicine
Volume45
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Bibliographical note

PT: J; NR: 52; TC: 1; J9: PSYCHOL MED; PG: 11; GA: CB4SR; UT: WOS:000349618900003

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Does nature have joints worth carving? A discussion of taxometrics, model-based clustering and latent variable mixture modeling'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this