Does Remorse Count? ICTY Convicts’ Reflections on Their Crimes in Early Release Decisions

Barbora Hola, J. van Wijk, Fransesca Costantini, Armi Korhonen

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Based on all publicly available International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia (ICTY) early release decisions as of May 31, 2017, this explorative article empirically analyzes, systematizes, and evaluates how ICTY convicts reflected on their past crimes during early release proceedings and how this affected decision-making of the ICTY President regarding their level of rehabilitation and early release. For this purpose, we developed an analytical framework distinguishing between acknowledgement of responsibility and remorse, as two forms of reflection on the past crimes, and their general and personal dimensions. Our analysis demonstrates that of all 53 individuals early released at the ICTY, 36% were considered sufficiently rehabilitated and a part of their sentence pardoned without any information regarding their outlook on the crimes they had been convicted of. Only 19% of the early released prisoners acknowledged their personal responsibility and expressed remorse for the crimes they committed. Others denied, only partially accepted responsibility and/or showed remorse on a general level, which, however, did not bar their early release. The article argues that this haphazard practice brings into question the ICTY legacy with respect to its goal of offender rehabilitation and its potential effects on reconciliation in the Former Yugoslavia.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)349-371
Number of pages23
JournalInternational Criminal Justice Review
Volume28
Issue number4
Early online date19 Apr 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2018

Fingerprint

Yugoslavia
offense
responsibility
rehabilitation
prisoner
reconciliation
offender
president
decision making

Keywords

  • acknowledgement of responsibility
  • early release
  • ICTY
  • rehabilitation
  • remorse

Cite this

@article{c36de4d959fd4bb8a74f21dbfaeae569,
title = "Does Remorse Count?: ICTY Convicts’ Reflections on Their Crimes in Early Release Decisions",
abstract = "Based on all publicly available International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia (ICTY) early release decisions as of May 31, 2017, this explorative article empirically analyzes, systematizes, and evaluates how ICTY convicts reflected on their past crimes during early release proceedings and how this affected decision-making of the ICTY President regarding their level of rehabilitation and early release. For this purpose, we developed an analytical framework distinguishing between acknowledgement of responsibility and remorse, as two forms of reflection on the past crimes, and their general and personal dimensions. Our analysis demonstrates that of all 53 individuals early released at the ICTY, 36{\%} were considered sufficiently rehabilitated and a part of their sentence pardoned without any information regarding their outlook on the crimes they had been convicted of. Only 19{\%} of the early released prisoners acknowledged their personal responsibility and expressed remorse for the crimes they committed. Others denied, only partially accepted responsibility and/or showed remorse on a general level, which, however, did not bar their early release. The article argues that this haphazard practice brings into question the ICTY legacy with respect to its goal of offender rehabilitation and its potential effects on reconciliation in the Former Yugoslavia.",
keywords = "acknowledgement of responsibility, early release, ICTY, rehabilitation, remorse",
author = "Barbora Hola and {van Wijk}, J. and Fransesca Costantini and Armi Korhonen",
year = "2018",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1057567718766228",
language = "English",
volume = "28",
pages = "349--371",
journal = "International Criminal Justice Review",
issn = "1057-5677",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "4",

}

Does Remorse Count? ICTY Convicts’ Reflections on Their Crimes in Early Release Decisions. / Hola, Barbora; van Wijk, J.; Costantini, Fransesca; Korhonen, Armi.

In: International Criminal Justice Review, Vol. 28, No. 4, 01.12.2018, p. 349-371.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Does Remorse Count?

T2 - ICTY Convicts’ Reflections on Their Crimes in Early Release Decisions

AU - Hola, Barbora

AU - van Wijk, J.

AU - Costantini, Fransesca

AU - Korhonen, Armi

PY - 2018/12/1

Y1 - 2018/12/1

N2 - Based on all publicly available International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia (ICTY) early release decisions as of May 31, 2017, this explorative article empirically analyzes, systematizes, and evaluates how ICTY convicts reflected on their past crimes during early release proceedings and how this affected decision-making of the ICTY President regarding their level of rehabilitation and early release. For this purpose, we developed an analytical framework distinguishing between acknowledgement of responsibility and remorse, as two forms of reflection on the past crimes, and their general and personal dimensions. Our analysis demonstrates that of all 53 individuals early released at the ICTY, 36% were considered sufficiently rehabilitated and a part of their sentence pardoned without any information regarding their outlook on the crimes they had been convicted of. Only 19% of the early released prisoners acknowledged their personal responsibility and expressed remorse for the crimes they committed. Others denied, only partially accepted responsibility and/or showed remorse on a general level, which, however, did not bar their early release. The article argues that this haphazard practice brings into question the ICTY legacy with respect to its goal of offender rehabilitation and its potential effects on reconciliation in the Former Yugoslavia.

AB - Based on all publicly available International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia (ICTY) early release decisions as of May 31, 2017, this explorative article empirically analyzes, systematizes, and evaluates how ICTY convicts reflected on their past crimes during early release proceedings and how this affected decision-making of the ICTY President regarding their level of rehabilitation and early release. For this purpose, we developed an analytical framework distinguishing between acknowledgement of responsibility and remorse, as two forms of reflection on the past crimes, and their general and personal dimensions. Our analysis demonstrates that of all 53 individuals early released at the ICTY, 36% were considered sufficiently rehabilitated and a part of their sentence pardoned without any information regarding their outlook on the crimes they had been convicted of. Only 19% of the early released prisoners acknowledged their personal responsibility and expressed remorse for the crimes they committed. Others denied, only partially accepted responsibility and/or showed remorse on a general level, which, however, did not bar their early release. The article argues that this haphazard practice brings into question the ICTY legacy with respect to its goal of offender rehabilitation and its potential effects on reconciliation in the Former Yugoslavia.

KW - acknowledgement of responsibility

KW - early release

KW - ICTY

KW - rehabilitation

KW - remorse

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85042020653&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85042020653&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1057567718766228

DO - 10.1177/1057567718766228

M3 - Article

VL - 28

SP - 349

EP - 371

JO - International Criminal Justice Review

JF - International Criminal Justice Review

SN - 1057-5677

IS - 4

ER -