Does the component processes task assess text-based inferences important for reading comprehension? A path analysis in primary school children

Stephanie I. Wassenburg*, Björn B. de Koning, Meinou H. de Vries, Menno van der Schoot

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Using a component processes task (CPT) that differentiates between higher-level cognitive processes of reading comprehension provides important advantages over commonly used general reading comprehension assessments. The present study contributes to further development of the CPT by evaluating the relative contributions of its components (text memory, text inferencing, and knowledge integration) and working memory to general reading comprehension within a single study using path analyses. Participants were 173 third- and fourth-grade children. As hypothesized, knowledge integration was the only component of the CPT that directly contributed to reading comprehension, indicating that the text-inferencing component did not assess inferential processes related to reading comprehension. Working memory was a significant predictor of reading comprehension over and above the component processes. Future research should focus on finding ways to ensure that the text-inferencing component taps into processes important for reading comprehension.

Original languageEnglish
Article number895
JournalFrontiers in Psychology
Volume7
Issue numberJUN
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 14 Jun 2016

Keywords

  • Assessment
  • Children
  • Component processes task
  • Reading comprehension
  • Text-based inferences
  • Working memory

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Does the component processes task assess text-based inferences important for reading comprehension? A path analysis in primary school children'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this